Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:30:00.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are today’s children more able to distinguish right from wrong than their earlier counterparts?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2015

J. Clare Wilson
J. Clare Wilson*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Sydney
*
Department of Psychology, University of Kent, CANTERBURY CT2 7NP UK, Phone: 44 1227 823081, Fax: 44 1227 827030, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The present paper reviews the empirical psychological literature on moral development to examine the hypothesis that children today are more advanced in their moral reasoning than their earlier counterparts. The review briefly examines the classic research on how children understand morality and when they understand the short- and long-term consequences of their behaviour. It then examines replication studies in the moral development literature. The review concludes that there is no evidence for or against the proposition that today’s children are more advanced in their moral reasoning than their earlier counterparts, as there is a distinct lack of reliable replication studies that could answer the question one way or another.

Keywords

Age of Criminal CulpabilityConsequencesDoli IncapaxGuilty MindMens ReaMoral Development
Type
Research Article
Information
The Educational and Developmental Psychologist , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , 2001 , pp. 15 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Psychological Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boehm, L. (1962). The development of conscience: A comparison of American children of different mental and socioeconomic levels. Child Development, 33, 575–590.Google Scholar
Bull, N.J. (1969). Moral judgement from childhood to adolescence. London; Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Case, R. (Ed.). (1992). The mind’s staircase: Exploring the conceptual underpinnings of children’s thought and knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Chandler, M., Fritz, A.S., & Hala, S. (1989). Small scale deceit: Deception as a marker of two-, three- and four-year-olds’ early theories of mind. Child Development, 60, 1263–1277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, J. (1999). Making sense of the social world: Mindreading, emotion, and understanding. In Zelazo, R. D., Astington, J. W., & Olson, D.R. (pp. 229–242). Developing theories of intention: Social understanding and self-control. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Emler, N. (1998). Sociomoral understanding. In Campbell, A. & Muncer, S. (Eds.), The social child (pp.293–323). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H.J. (1953). The structure of human personality. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Gibbs, J.C., Basinger, K.S., & Fuller, D. (1992). Moral maturity: Measuring the development of sociomoral reflection. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hartshorne, H., & May, M.A. (1928). Studies in the nature of character: I, Studies in deceit. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hartshorne, H., & May, M.A. (1929). Studies in the nature of character: II, Studies in service and self-control. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hartshorne, H., & May, M. A. (1930). Studies in the nature of character: III, Studies in the organization of character. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havinghurst, R. J., & Taba, H. (1949). Adolescent character and personality. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keasey, C. B. (1977). Children’s developing awareness and usage of intentionality and motives. Current Theory and Research in Motivation, 25, 220–260. .Google ScholarPubMed
Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Langford, P.E. (1995). Approaches to the development of moral reasoning. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lickona, T. (1976). Moral development and behaviour: Theory, research, and social issues. New York: Holt, Reinhart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Loughran, R. (1967, February). A pattern of development in moral judgments made by adolescents derived from Piaget’s schema of its development in childhood. Educational Review, 18, 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, E., & Watkins, S. H. (1925). An investigation into the development of the moral conceptions of children, Parts I & II. The Forum of Education, IV.Google Scholar
MacRae, D. Jr. (1954). A test of Piaget’s theories of moral development. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 14–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piaget, J. (1932/1965). The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Puka, B. (Ed.). (1994). Moral development: A Compendium: Vol. 5. New research in moral development New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Rotenberg, K.J. (1980). “A promise kept, a promise broken”: Developmental bases of trust. Child Development, 51, 614–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saltzstein, H. D. (1994). The relation between moral judgement and behaviour: A social-cognitive and decision-making analysis. Human Development, 37, 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, D. M., & Watson, W. L. (1985). In search of the psychological correlates of criminal responsibility: Fool’s errand or enlightened approach. In Cummins, R. A. & Burgess, Z.A. (Eds.), Age and criminal responsibility in children (pp. 45–51). Melbourne: The Australian Psychological Society.Google Scholar
Turiel, E. (1997). Beyond particular and universal ways: Contexts for morality. In Saltzstein, H.D. (Eds.), Culture as a context for moral development: New perspectives on the particular and the universal (pp. 87–106). New Directions for Child Development, 76, Summer.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed