Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:38:10.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PANAEOLUS (AGARICALES) FROM WESTERN PARANÁ STATE, SOUTH BRAZIL, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES, PANAEOLUS SYLVATICUS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2019

A. G. S. Silva-Filho ,
C. Seger  and
V. G. Cortez
A. G. S. Silva-Filho*
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Botânica, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Caixa Postal 19031, 81531-980 Curitiba – PR, Paraná, Brazil. E-mail for correspondence: [email protected]
C. Seger
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Botânica, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Caixa Postal 19031, 81531-980 Curitiba – PR, Paraná, Brazil. E-mail for correspondence: [email protected]
V. G. Cortez
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Rua Pioneiro 2153, Jardim Dallas, CEP 85950-000, Palotina, Paraná, Brazil
Get access

Abstract

Three species of Panaeolus were collected in the western region of Paraná State, South Brazil. Panaeolus sylvaticus is proposed as a new species, based on macro- and micromorphological features and substrate (rotten wood and litter). Panaeolus antillarum and P. papilionaceus var. parvisporus, two coprophilous and widely distributed species, are also reported. All species are illustrated and discussed in detail, regarding their taxonomy, ecology and distribution. A key to the known species of Panaeolus from Paraná State is presented.

Keywords

Bolbitiaceaecoprophilous fungimushroomsPsathyrellaceaeseasonal semideciduous foresttaxonomy
Type
Articles
Information
Edinburgh Journal of Botany , Volume 76 , Issue 2 , July 2019 , pp. 297 - 309
Copyright
© Trustees of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (2019) 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alves, M. H. & Cavalcanti, M. A. (1996). Coprinaceae en el campus de la Universidad Federal de Pernambuco (Recife. PE, Brasil). Bol. Micol. 11(1–2): 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Meijer, A. A. R. (2006). Preliminary list of the macromycetes from the Brazilian state of Paraná. Bol. Mus. Bot. Munic. 68: 1–59.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, E. (1996). Taxonomische Revision der Gattungen Panaeolus und Panaeolina (Fungi, Agaricales, Coprinaceae). Biblioth. Bot. 147: 1–150.Google Scholar
Guzmán, G. (1978). A new species of Panaeolus from South America. Mycotaxon 7: 221–224.Google Scholar
Guzmán, G., Allen, J. W. & Gartz, J. (2000). Worldwide geographical distribution of the neurotropic fungi, an analysis and discussion. Ann. Mus. Civici-Rovereto 14: 189–280.Google Scholar
Halama, M., Witkowska, D., Jasicka-Misiak, I. & Poliwoda, A. (2014). An adventive Panaeolus antillarum in Poland (Basidiomycota, Agaricales) with notes on its taxonomy, geographical distribution, and ecology. Cryptog. Mycol. 35(1): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, P. M. (2018). Species Fungorum (version Oct 2017). In: Roskov, Y., Orrell, T., Nicolson, D., Bailly, N., Kirk, P. M., Bourgoin, T., DeWalt, R. E., Decock, W., De Wever, A., Nieukerken, E. van, Zarucchi, J. & Penev, L. (eds) Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life. Digital resource at www.catalogueoflife.org/col. Leiden: Species 2000, Naturalis. (Accessed 31 July 2018.)Google Scholar
Kornerup, A. & Wanscher, J. H. (1978). Methuen Handbook of Colour. London: Eyre Methuen.Google Scholar
Largent, D. L. (1986). How to Identify Mushrooms to Genus I: Macroscopic Features. Eureka: Mad River Press.Google Scholar
Largent, D. L., Johnson, D. & Watling, R. (1977). How to Identify Mushrooms to Genus III: Microscopic Features. Eureka: Mad River Press.Google Scholar
Maia, L. C., Carvalho Júnior, A. A., Cavalcanti, L. H., Gugliotta, A. M., Drechsler-Santos, E. R., Santiago, A. L. M. A., Cáceres, M. S., Gibertoni, T. B., Aptroot, A., Giachini, A. J., Soares, A. M. S., Silva, A. C. G., Magnago, A. C., Goto, B. T., Lira, C. R. S., Montoya, C. A. S., Pires-Zottarelli, C. L. A., Silva, D. K. A., Soares, D. J., Rezende, D. H. C., Luz, E. D. M. N., Gumboski, E. L., Wartchow, F., Karstedt, F., Freire, F. M., Coutinho, F. P., de Melo, G. S. N., Sotão, H. M. P., Baseia, I. G., Pereira, J., Oliveira, J. J. S., Souza, J. F., Bezerra, J. L., Araujo Neta, L. S., Pfenning, L. H., Gusmão, L. F. P., Neves, M. A., Capelari, M., Jaeger, M. C. W., Pulgarín, M. P., Menolli Junior, N., Medeiros, P. S., Friedrich, R. C. S., Chikowski, R. S., Pires, R. M., Melo, R. F., Silveira, R. M. B., Urrea-Valencia, S., Cortez, V. G. & Silva, V. F. (2015). Diversity of Brazilian fungi. Rodriguésia 66(4): 1033–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matheny, P. B., Curtis, J. M., Hofstetter, V., Aime, M. C., Moncalvo, J. M., Ge, Z. W., Yang, Z. L., Slot, J. C., Ammirati, J. F., Baroni, T. J., Bougher, N. L., Hughes, K. W., Lodge, D. J., Kerrigan, R. W., Seidl, M. T., Aanen, D. K., DeNitis, M., Daniele, G. M., Desjardin, D. E., Kropp, B. R. Norvell, L. L. Parker, A. Vellinga, E. C. Vilgalys, R. & Hibbett, D. S. (2006). Major clades of Agaricales: a multilocus phylogenetic overview. Mycologia 98: 982–995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ola’h, G. M. (1969). Le Genre Panaeolus: Essai Taxinomique et Physiologique. Paris: Herbier Louis Marie.Google Scholar
Panchetti, M. (2015). Contributo alla conoscenza del Genere Panaeolus. P. guttulatus var. merrisiani, var. nov. Riv. Micol. 58: 319–329.Google Scholar
Pancorbo, F. & Ribes, M. A. (2010). Setas de dunas mediterráneas. Bol. Soc. Micol. Madrid 34: 271–294.Google Scholar
Rick, J. (1930) Contributio IV ad monographiam Agaricearum Brasiliensium. Brotéria, Sér. Bot. 24: 97–118.Google Scholar
Rick, J. (1961). Basidiomycetes Eubasidii in Rio Grande do Sul – Brasilia. 5. Iheringia, Bot. 8: 296–450.Google Scholar
Schultes, R. E. (1939). Plantae Mexicanae II. The identification of teonanacatl, a narcotic basidiomycete of the Aztecs. Bot. Mus. Leafl. 7(3): 37–54.Google Scholar
Silva-Filho, A. G. S. & Cortez, V. G. (2017). Hohenbuehelia (Pleurotaceae) in western Paraná, Brazil. Acta Biol. Paran. 46(1–2): 23–38.Google Scholar
Silva-Filho, A. G. S., Coelho, G. & Cortez, V. G. (2016). Further notes on the morphology and distribution of Neopaxillus echinospermus (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) in Southern Brazil. Check List 12(1): 1834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva-Filho, A. G. S., Seger, C. & Cortez, V. G. (2018a). The neurotropic genus Copelandia (Basidiomycota) in western Paraná State, Brazil. Revista Mex. Biodivers. 89(1): 15–21.Google Scholar
Silva-Filho, A. G. S., Teixeira-Silva, M. A. & Cortez, V. G. (2018b). New species, new combination, and notes on Clitocella and Rhodocybe (Entolomataceae) from Paraná State, Brazil. Darwiniana, Nueva Ser. 6(1): 58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, R. (1986). The Agaricales in Modern Taxonomy. Koenigstein: Koeltz.Google Scholar
Smith, A. H. (1948). Studies in the dark-spored agarics. Mycologia 40(6): 669–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamets, P. (1996). Psilocybin Mushrooms of the World. Berkeley: Ten Speed Press.Google Scholar
Stijve, T. & De Meijer, A. A. R. (1993). Macromycetes from the state of Paraná, Brazil. 4. The psychoactive species. Arq. Biol. Tecnol. 36(2): 313–329.Google Scholar
Tóth, A., Hausknecht, A., Krisai-Greilhuber, I., Papp, T., Vágvölgyi, C. & Nagy, L. G. (2013). Iteratively refined guide trees help improving alignment and phylogenetic inference in the mushroom family Bolbitiaceae. PLoS ONE 8(2): e56143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watling, R. & Gregory, N. M. (1987). British Fungus Flora: Agarics and Boleti. Volume 5, Strophariaceae & Coprinaceae p.p. Hypholoma, Melanotus, Psilocybe, Stropharia, Lacrymaria & Panaeolus. Edinburgh: Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Young, A. M. (1989). The panaeoloideae (Fungi, Basidiomycetes) of Australia. Austral. Syst. Bot. 2: 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar