Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:30:15.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The generic position of C.B.Clarke's species of Paracaryum (Boraginaceae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2010

Get access

Abstract

The classification of three subtropical, primarily Indian, members of the tribe Cynoglosseae (Boraginaceae) which C. B. Clarke included in Paracaryum P. coelestinum (Lindley) Bentham, P. lambertianum C. B. Clarke and P.malabaricum C. B. Clarke – is discussed. The conclusion reached is that Clarke was correct to assign them all to one genus, but that none has any affinity with the mainly Irano-Turanian genus Paracaryum (DC.) Boiss. Cynoglossum L. sect. Paracaryopsis H. Riedl, to which Riedl transferred P. coelestinum, is elevated to generic rank as Paracaryopsis (H. Riedl) R. Mill, with three new combinations at specific rank. A systematic treatment of Paracaryopsis is given.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birdwood, H. M. (1897). A catalogue of the flora of Matheran and Mahableshwar (revised edition). With a note by Theodore Cooke … Bombay. 56p. (Reprinted from Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 10: 394–439 [Supplementary Note … by Cooke. pp.44–448], 1896).Google Scholar
Bole, P. V. & Almeida, M. R. (‘1984’, pub. 1990). Material for the Flora of Mahableshwar – 5. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 81(2): 364379.Google Scholar
Brand, A. (1921). Borraginaceae-Borraginoideae–Cynoglosseae. In Engler, A., Das Pflanzenreich Heft 78 (IV. 252). Leipzig.Google Scholar
Cooke, T. (1905). Flora of the Presidency of Bombay. Vol.2: Compositae–Gramineae. London.Google Scholar
Gamble, J. S. (1922). Paracaryum. In The Flora of the Presidency of Madras. II. Rubiaceae–Compositae, pp.900901. London.Google Scholar
Hilger, H. H., Balzer, M., Frey, W. & Podlech, D. (1985). Heteromerikarpie und Fruchtpolymorphismus bei Microparacaryum, gen. nov. (Boraginaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 148: 291312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, J. D. (1883). The Flora of British India. Vol.3. London.Google Scholar
Mill, R. R. (1977). Paracaryum. In Davis, P. H. (compiler), Materials for a Flora of Turkey XXXIV. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 35: 303308.Google Scholar
Riedl, H. (1962). Bemerkungen über Cynoglossum coelestinum Lindl. und C. glochidiatum Wall. sowie Versuch einer Neugliederung der Gattung Cynoglossum L. Österreichisches Botanisches Zeitschrift 109: 385394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedl, H. (1971). Die Gattung Adelocaryum Brand. Österreichisches Botanisches Zeitschrift 119: 168173.Google Scholar
Santapau, H. (1953). Excursión botánica a Mahabléshwar, Estado de Bombay (India), durante el mes de agosto de 1951. Anales del Instituto botánico A. J. Caianilles 11(1): 281317.Google Scholar
Santapau, H. (1967). The Flora of Khandala on the Western Ghats of India. Ed. 3. Calcutta.Google Scholar
Strey, M. (1931). Karyologische Studien an Borraginoideae. Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Biologic Abteilung E, Planta: Archil für wissenschaftliche Botanik 14(3/4): 682730.Google Scholar
Zhukova, P. G. (1967). [Karyology of some plants cultivated in the Arctic-Alpine Botanical Garden.] In Avrorin, N. A. (ed.), Plantarum in zonam polarem transportatio 2: 137149. Leningrad. [In Russian.]Google Scholar