Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:18:59.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A REVISION OF GAGNEPAINIA AND HEMIORCHIS (GLOBBEAE: ZINGIBERACEAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2020

S. Tan
Affiliation:
Singapore Botanic Gardens, National Parks Board, 1 Cluny Road, Singapore259569.
R. Hollands
Affiliation:
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, EdinburghEH3 5LR, Scotland, UK. E-mail for correspondence: [email protected]
M. Pavlíková
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, 128 01Prague 2, Czech Republic.
T. Fér
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, 128 01Prague 2, Czech Republic.
M. F. Newman
Affiliation:
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, EdinburghEH3 5LR, Scotland, UK. E-mail for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The species of Gagnepainia K.Schum. and Hemiorchis Kurz are revised throughout their ranges. These genera are shown with evidence from morphological and molecular studies to be distinct, although closely related to each other. Two species of Gagnepainia and three of Hemiorchis are recognised. A key to the genera of Globbeae and keys to the species of Gagnepainia and Hemiorchis are given, all names are typified and descriptions are provided. Conservation assessments of all taxa are proposed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Trustees of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (2020)

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baillon, H. (1895). Sur quelques Hemiorchis . Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Paris 2: 11951196.Google Scholar
Baker, J. G. (1890). Tab. 7120 – Hemiorchis burmanica. Bot. Mag. 116 (ser. 3, 46): Tab. 7120.Google Scholar
Benedict, J. C., Smith, S. Y., Collinson, M. E., Leong-Škorničková, J., Specht, C. D., Marone, F., Xiao, X. & Parkinson, D. Y. (2015). Seed morphology and anatomy and its utility in recognizing subfamilies and tribes of Zingiberaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 102(11): 18141841.Google ScholarPubMed
Darriba, D., Taboada, G. L., Doallo, R. & Posada, D. (2012). jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature, Meth. 9(8): 772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farris, J. S., Källersjö, M., Kluge, A. G. & Bult, C. (1994). Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10(3): 315319.Google Scholar
Gagnepain, F. (1908). Zingibéracées. In: Lecomte, H. (ed.) Flore Générale de l’Indo-Chine, vol. 6: pp. 25121. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Gagnepain, F. (1911). Thorel (Clovis) 1833–1911. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 58: 523528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagnepain, F. (ed.) (1944). Flore Générale de l’Indo-Chine, tome préliminaire. Paris: Masson & Co.Google Scholar
Guindon, S. & Gascuel, O. (2003). A simple, fast and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52(5): 696704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, T. A. (1999). BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids Symp. Ser. 41: 9598.Google Scholar
Harmand, J. (1994). L’Homme du Mékong – un Voyageur Solitaire à Travers l’Indochine Inconnue. Paris: Phébus.Google Scholar
Hijmans, R. (no date). Diva-GIS. Online. Available: http://www.diva-gis.org/ Google Scholar
Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Ronquist, F. (2001). MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17(8): 754755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IUCN (2012). IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria, version 3.1, 2nd edition. Online. Available: http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/categories-and-criteria (consulted 15 February 2018).Google Scholar
Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. (2013). MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molec. Biol. Evol. 30(4): 772780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, G. (1894). In: Brühl, P., King, G. & Prain, D. Descriptions of new and rare Indian plants. Ann. Roy. Bot. Gard. (Calcutta) 5: 71166.Google Scholar
Kress, W. J., Prince, L. M. & Williams, K. J. (2002). The phylogeny and a new classification of the gingers (Zingiberaceae): evidence from molecular data. Amer. J. Bot. 89(1): 16821696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurz, W. S. (1873). New Burmese plants, II. J. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, Pt. 2, Nat. Hist. 42(2): 59110.Google Scholar
Larsen, K. & Larsen, S. S. (2006). Gingers of Thailand. Mae Rim, Chiang Mai, Thailand: Queen Sirikit Botanic Garden, The Botanical Garden Organization.Google Scholar
Larsen, K. & Triboun, P. (2000). Hemiorchis rhodorrhachis K. Schum. (Zingiberaceae), a new record for Thailand. Thai Forest Bull., Bot. 28: 3943.Google Scholar
Larsen, K., Lock, J. M., Maas, H. & Maas, P. J. M. (1998). Zingiberaceae. In: Kubitzki, K. (ed.) The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Volume IV, Flowering Plants. Monocotyledons. Alismatanae and Commelinanae (except Gramineae). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Leong-Škorničková, J. (2009). The genus Gagnepainia – orchids or gingers? Gardenwise 32: 31.Google Scholar
Miller, A. G., Hall, M., Watson, M. F., Knees, S. G, Pendry, C. A. & Pullan, M. R. (2015). Floras yesterday, today and tomorrow. In: Watson, M. F., Lyal, C. H. C. & Pendry, C. A. (eds) Descriptive Taxonomy. The Foundation of Biodiversity Research. The Systematics Association Special Volume 84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Phạm, H. H. (2000). Cây Cỏ Việt Nam. An Illustrated Flora of Vietnam, vol. 3, p. 447. Ho Chi Minh City: Tre Publishing House.Google Scholar
Picheansoonthon, C. & Tiyaworanant, S. (2010). The genus Gagnepainia K.Schum. (Zingiberaceae) in Thailand. J. Roy. Inst. Thailand 2: 9199.Google Scholar
Popp, M. & Oxelman, B. (2001). Inferring the history of the polyploid Silene aegaea (Caryophyllaceae) using plastid and homoeologous nuclear DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 20(3): 474481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2003). MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19(12):15721574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schumann, K. M. (1904). Zingiberaceae. In: Engler, A. (ed.) Das Pflanzenreich, IV, 46 (Heft 20), pp. 1458. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.Google Scholar
Singh, B., Phukan, S. J., Singh, V. N., Sinha, B. K. & Borthakur, S. K. (2012). Recollection of Hemiorchis pantlingii King after a century from Meghalaya. Indian J. Forest 35(1): 9798.Google Scholar
Smithsonian Institution (no date) Online. Available: https://www.learninglab.si.edu/resources/view/241583# Google Scholar
Stamatakis, A. (2014). RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30(9): 13121313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swofford, D. L. (2002). PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Turland, N. J., Wiersema, J. H., Barrie, F. R., Greuter, W., Hawksworth, D. L., Herendeen, P. S., Knapp, S., Kusber, W.-H., Li, D.-Z., Marhold, K., May, T. W., McNeill, J., Monro, A. M., Prado, J., Price, M. J. & Smith, G. F. (eds) (2018). International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) Adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017. Regnum Vegetabile 159. Glashütten: Koeltz Botanical Books. doi: 10.12705/Code.2018 Google Scholar
Williams, K. J., Kress, W. J. & Manos, P. S. (2004). The phylogeny, evolution, and classification of the genus Globba and tribe Globbeae (Zingiberaceae): appendages do matter. Amer. J. Bot. 91(1): 100114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zingiberaceae Resource Centre (continuously updated). Electronic database. Online. Available: http://elmer.rbge.org.uk/zrc/ Google Scholar