Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T16:46:26.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Very Idea of Epistemology

A Comment on Standards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Donald McCloskey
Donald McCloskey
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letter to the Editors
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , April 1989 , pp. 1 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

References

REFERENCES

Borges, Jorge Luis 1952 (1964). “The Analytical Language of John Wilkes.” In Other Inquisitions. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Hausman, Daniel M., and McPherson, Michael S. 1987. “Standards.” Economics and Philosophy 4:1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, Keith, and Wagner, Carl. c. 1981. Rational Consensus in Scienceand Society. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, Donald N. 1985. The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, John, Megill, Allan, and McCloskey, D. N.(editors). 1987. The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas N. 1985. Arguer's Position: A Pragmatic Study of Ad Hominem Attack, Criticism, Refutation, and Fallacy. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. 1925 (1953). The Common Reader. First Series. New York and London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar