Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T04:50:12.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Utility of Multiple Utility: A Comment on Brennan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2009

Mark A. Lutz
Mark A. Lutz
Affiliation:
University of Maine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comments
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , April 1993 , pp. 145 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akerlof, George. 1982. “Labor Contracts as a Partial Gift Exchange.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 97:543–69.Google Scholar
Boland, Lawrence. 1981. “On the Futility of Criticizing the Neoclassical Maximization Hypothesis.” American Economic Review 71:1031–36.Google Scholar
Brennan, Timothy J. 1989. “A Methodological Assessment of Multiple Utility Frameworks.” Economics and Philosophy 5:189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Timothy J. 1991. “The Trouble with Norms.” In Social Norms and Economic Institutions, edited by Koford, Kenneth and Miller, Jeffrey, pp. 85–94. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Broome, John. 1991. “Utility.” Economics and Philosophy 7:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, Bruce. 1983. “The Neoclassical Maximization Hypothesis: Comment.” American Economic Review 73:824–27.Google Scholar
Colander, David. 1989. “Research on the Economics Profession.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3:4:137–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1985. “Weakness of the Will and the Free-Rider Problem.” Economics and Philosophy 1:231–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai. 1986. “The Case for a Multiple-Utility Conception.” Economics and Philosophy 2:159–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai. 1988. The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. 1971. “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person.” Journal of Philosophy 68:5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, David. 1984. International Journal of Social Economics 2:3–4:92–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamlin, Alan P. 1986. Ethics, Economics and the State. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1985. “Against Parsimony.” Economics and Philosophy 1:7–21.Google Scholar
Koford, Kenneth, and Penno, Mark. 1988. “Accounting, Principal-Agent Theory, and Selfinterested behavior.” In Implications for Agency Theory for Business Ethics. New York: W.H.Google Scholar
Leibenstein, Harvey. 1979. “A Branch of Economics Is Missing: Micro-Micro Theory.” Journal of Economics Literature 17:477–502.Google Scholar
Lepper, M. R., and Greene, D. (editors). 1978. The Hidden Costs of Reward. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lutz, Mark A. 1985. “Beyond Economic Man: Humanistic Economics.” In Economics and Philosophy, edited by Koslowski, Peter. Tuebingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Lutz, Mark A., and Lux, Kenneth. 1989. Humanistic Economics: The New Challenge. New York: Bootstrap Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Barry. 1990. “The Creation and Destruction of Value.” The American Psychologist 45:7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1980/1981. “Plural Utility.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 80:193–215.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1982. Choice, Welfare and Measurement. Oxford: Basil Balckwell.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1982. “The Diversity of Goods.” In Utilitarianism and Beyond, edited by Sen, A. and William, B., pp. 129–44. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wible, James. 1991. “Maximization Replication and Economic Rationality of Positive Economic Science.” Review of Political Economy 3:2:164–86.Google Scholar
Wong, Stanley. 1978. Foundations of Paul Samuelson's Revealed Preference Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar