Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-gr6zb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-16T21:22:24.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Utility: Ideas and Terminology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Amartya Sen
Amartya Sen
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comments
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , October 1991 , pp. 277 - 283
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arrow, K. J. 1951. Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bentham, J.. 1789. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: Payne. Republished, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, J.. 1822. “Note” on An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, included in Warnock (1962) [the page numbers refer to this publication].Google Scholar
Brandt, R.. 1979. A Theory of the Good and the Right. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Broome, J.. 1991. “Utility.” Economics and Philosophy 7:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debreu, G.. 1959. Theory of Value. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, F. P. 1881. Mathematical Psychics. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Gosling, J. C. B. 1969. Pleasure and Desire. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J.. 1986. Well-being. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1981. Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Methods and Point. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, J. 1955. “Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility.” Journal of Political Economy 63:309–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1983. Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jevons, W. S. 1871. The Theory of Political Economy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. 1890. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1838. “Bentham,” London and Westminster Review, July. Reprinted in Warnock (1962) [the page numbers refer to the latter publication].Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1861. Utilitarianism. London. Reprinted in Warnock (1962) [the page numbers refer to the latter publication].Google Scholar
Mirrlees, J. 1982. “The Economic Uses of Utilitarianism.” In Utilitarianism and Beyond, edited by Sen, A. and Williams, B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1920. The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. 1978. Foundations: Essays in Philosophy, Logic, Mathematics and Economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1947. Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. 1874. The Method of Ethics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Warnock, M. (editor). 1962. Utilitarianism, On Liberty, Essay on Bentham, by John Stuart Mill, together with selected writings of Jeremy Bentham and John Austin. London: Collins/Fontana.Google Scholar