Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:02:32.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Structuralist View of Economic Theories: A Review Essay: The Case of General Equilibrium in Particular

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

D. Wade Hands
D. Wade Hands
Affiliation:
University of Puget Sound
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , October 1985 , pp. 303 - 335
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agassi, J. and Wettersten, J.R. 1980. “Stegmüller Squared.” Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 11:86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K.J. and Hahn, F.H. 1971. General Competitive Analysis. San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
Balzer, W. 1982a. “A Logical Reconstruction of Pure Exchange Economics.” Erkenntnis 17:23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balzer, W. 1982b. “Empirical Claims in Exchange Economics.” In Philosophy of Economics, edited by Stegmüller, W., Balzer, W., and Spohn, W.. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 16–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balzer, W. and Moulines, C.U. 1980. “On Theoreticity.” Synthese 44:467–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balzer, W. and Sneed, J.D. 1977. “Generalized Net Structures of Empirical Theories I.” Studia Logica 36:195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, J. 1980. “Optimal-Design Models and the Strategy of Model Building in Evolutionary Biology.” Philosophy of Science, 47:532–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G.S. 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. 1980. The Methodology of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boland, L.A. 1982. The Foundations of Economic Method. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Brown, E.C. and Solow, R.M. (editors). 1983. Paul Samuelson and Modern Economic Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B.J. 1982. Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Chipman, J.S. 1965. “A Survey of the Theory of International Trade: Part 2, The Neoclassical Theory.” Econometrica 33:685–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chipman, J.S. 1966. “A Survey of the Theory of International Trade: Part 3, The Modern Theory.” Econometrica 34: 18–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debreu, G. 1959. Theory of Value. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Debreu, G. 1974. “Excess Demand Functions.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 1:15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debreu, G. 1982. “Existence of Competitive Equilibrium.” In Handbook of Mathematical Economics, edited by Arrow, K.J. and Intriligator, M.D.. Amsterdam: North-Holland, Vol. 2, pp. 607–743.Google Scholar
Debreu, G. 1983. Mathematical Economics: Twenty Papers of Gerard Debreu. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debreu, G. 1984. “Economic Theory in the Mathematical Mode.” American Economic Review 74:267–278.Google Scholar
Diederich, W. 1982a. “Stegmüller on the Structuralist Approach in the Philosophy of Science,” Erkenntnis 17: 377–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diederich, W. 1982b. “A Structuralist Reconstruction of Marx's Economics.” In Philosophy of Economics, edited by Stegmüller, W., Balzer, W., and Spohn, W.. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, J. 1970. Bourbaki. Hauppauge, N.Y.: Paideia Press.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. 1977. “Changing Patterns of Reconstruction.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28: 351–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia de la Sienra, A. 1982. “The Basic Core of the Marxian Economic Theory.” In Philosophy of Economics, edited by Stegmüller, W., Balzer, W., and Spohn, W.. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 118–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamminga, B. 1982. “Neoclassical Theory Structure and Theory Development: The Ohlin Samuelson Programme in the Theory of International Trade.” In Philosophy of Economics, edited by Stegmüller, W., Balzer, W., and Spohn, W.. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Hamminga, B. 1983. Neoclassical Theory Structure and Theory Development. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Händler, E.W. 1980a. “The Logical Structure of Modern Neoclassical Static Microeconomic Equilibrium Theory.” Erkenntnis 15:33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Händler, E.W. 1980b. “The Role of Utility and of Statistical Concepts in Empirical Economics: The Empirical Claims of the Systems of Aggregate Market Supply and Demand Functions Approach.” Erkenntnis 15:129–157.Google Scholar
Händler, E.W. 1982a. “The Evolution of Economic Theories: A Formal Approach.” Erkenntnis 18:65–96.Google Scholar
Händler, E.W. 1982b. “Ramsey-Elimination of Utility in Utility Maximizing Regression Approaches.” In Philosophy of Economics, edited by Stegmüller, W., Balzer, W., and Spohn, W.. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hands, D.W. 1985a. “The Logical Reconstruction of Pure Exchange Economics: Another Alternative.” Theory and Decision. 17, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Hands, D.W. 1985b. “Karl Popper and Economic Methodology: A New Look.” Economics and Philosophy. 1:83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslinger, F. 1982. “Structure and Problems of Equilibrium and Disequilibrium Theory.” In Philosophy of Economics, edited by Stegmüller, W., Balzer, W., and Spohn, W.. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslinger, F. 1983. “A Logical Reconstruction of Pure Exchange Economics: An Alternative View.” Erkenntnis 20: 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D.M. 1981a. Capital, Profits, and Prices. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D.M. 1981b. “Are General Equilibrium Theories Explanatory?” In Philosophy of Economics, edited by Pitt, J.C.. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, W. 1983. William Jaffe's Essays on Walras, edited by Walker, D.A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kötter, R. 1982. “General Equilibrium Theory-An Empirical Theory?” In Philosophy of Economics, edited by Stegmüller, W., Balzer, W., and Spohn, W.. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T.S. 1976. “Theory-Change as Structure-Change: Comments on the Sneed Formalism.” Erkenntnis 10:179–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laudan, L. 1977. Progress and Its Problems. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Leinfellner, W. 1983. “Marxian Paradigms versus Microeconomic Structures.” In Epistemology, Methodology, and the Social Sciences, edited by Cohen, R.S. and Wartofsky, M.W.. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 153–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, E. 1984. “A Semantic Approach to the Structure of Population Genetics.” Philosophy of Science 51:242–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantel, R.R. 1977. “Implications of Microeconomic Theory for Community Excess Demand Functions.” In Frontiers of Quantitative Economics IIIA, edited by Intriligator, M.D.. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 111–126.Google Scholar
McFadden, D., Mas-Colell, A., Mantel, R., and Richter, M.K. 1974. “A Characterization of Community Excess Demand Functions.” Journal of Economic Theory 9:361–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morishima, M. 1977. Walras' Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moulines, C.U. 1975. “A Logical Reconstruction of Simple Equilibrium Thermodynamics.” Erkenntnis 9:101–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulines, C.U. 1976. “Approximate Application of Empirical Theories: A General Explication.” Erkenntnis 10: 201–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulines, C.U. 1979. “Theory-Nets and the Evolution of Theories: The Example of Newtonian Mechanics.” Synthese 41:417–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulines, C.U. 1983. “On How the Distinction Between History and Philosophy of Science Should Not be Drawn.” Erkenntnis 19:285–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, D. 1981. “Is There Any Theoretical Justification for a Non-Statement View of Theories?” Synthese 46: 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, D. 1982. “Stegmüller on Kuhn and Incommensurability.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33: 389–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, D. and Tucci, M. 1982a. “On the Logical Structure of Some Value Systems of Classical Economics: Marx and Sraffa.” Theory and Decision 14:155–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, D. and Tucci, M. 1982b. “A General Net Structure for Theoretical Economics.” In Philosophy of Economics, edited by Stegmüller, W., Balzer, W., and Spohn, W.. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. R. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Shafer, W. and Sonnenschein, H. 1982. “Market Demand and Excess Demand Functions.” In Handbook of Mathematical Economics: Volume II, edited by Arrow, K.J. and Intriligator, M.D.. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 671–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoven, J. B. and Whalley, J. 1984. “Applied General Equilibrium Models of Taxation and International Trade: An Introduction and Survey.” Journal of Economic Literature 22: 1007–1051.Google Scholar
Sneed, J.D. 1971. The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneed, J.D. 1976. “Philosophical Problems in the Empirical Science of Science.” Erkenntnis 10:115–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneed, J.D. 1982. “The Logical Structure of Bayesian Decision Theory.” In Philosophy of Economics, edited by Stegmüller, W., Balzer, W., and Spohn, W.. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneed, J.D. 1983. “Structuralism and Scientific Realism.” Erkenntnis 19:345–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonnenschein, H. 1973. “Do Walras', Identity and Continuity Characterize the Class of Community Excess Demand Functions?” Journal of Economic Theory 6:345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegmüller, W. 1975. “Structures and Dynamics of Theories.” Erkenntnis 9:75–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegmüller, W. 1976a. The Structure and Dynamics of Theories. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegmüller, W. 1976b. “Accidental (‘Non-substantial’) Theory Change and Theory Dislodgement: To What Extent Logic Can Contribute to a Better Understanding of Certain Phenomena in the Dynamics of Theories.” Erkenntnis 10:147–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegmüller, W. 1978. “A Combined Approach to the Dynamics of Theories.” Theory and Decision 9:39–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegmüller, W. 1979. The Structuralist View of Theories. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suppe, F. (editor). 1977. The Structure of Scientific Theories. 2nd ed.. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Suppe, F. 1979. “Theory Structure.” In Current Research in Philosophy of Science, edited by Asquith, P.O. and Kyburg, H.E.. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 317–338.Google Scholar
Suppes, P. 1961. “A Comparison of the Meaning and Uses of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Sciences.” In The Concept and the Role of Model in Mathematics and Natural and Social Science, edited by Freudenthal, H.. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 163–177.Google Scholar
Suppes, P. 1979. “The Role of Formal Methods in the Philosophy of Science.” In Current Research in Philosophy of Science, edited by Asquith, P. D. and Kyburg, H. E.. East Lansing, Mich.: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 16–27.Google Scholar
Tuomela, R. 1978. “On the Structuralist Approach to the Dynamics of Theories.” Synthese 39:211–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E. R. 1979. Microfoundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E.R. 1983. “On the Existence of Competitive Equilibrium: 1930–1954.” Journal of Economic Literature 21:1–39.Google Scholar