Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T16:52:18.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Discounting

Retrieving the Civic Dimension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Susan Tenenbaum
Susan Tenenbaum
Affiliation:
Baruch College, CUNY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The social discount rate – the rate at which future benefit flows from government investment are discounted to present value – has been a frequent subject of technical debate among professional economists. From a broader perspective, however, the selection of an appropriate rate enjoins consideration of questions that define the very contours of our public philosophy. It carries implicit assumptions about the nature of citizenship, the relation between public and private spheres, and, most singularly, the status of a political society as it is located in time. A key determinant of intertemporal economic allocation, the social discount rate provides a unique registry of a polity's historical consciousness and perceptions of its intergenerational obligations. Yet the highly technical nature of the debate over the discount rate has proven inhospitable to scholars otherwise inclined to investigate its ethical dimensions. Some, notably A. K. Sen, have begun to address these philosophical issues, though much territory remains to be explored.

Type
Essays
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , April 1989 , pp. 33 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Burke, Edmund. 1969a. Reflections on the Revolution in France. In Representation, edited by Pitkin, Hanna, pp. 157–76. New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. 1969b. “Speech on a Motion for the Committee to Inquire into the State of Representation of the Commons in Parliament.” In Representation, edited by Pitkin, Hanna, pp. 157–76. New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
Chitnis, Anand. 1976. The Scottish Enlightenment. London: Croom Helm Ltd.Google Scholar
Feldstein, Martin. 1976. “The Inadequacy of Weighted Discount Rates.” In Cost-Benefit Analysis, edited by Layard, Richard, pp. 311–32. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, Ltd.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert. 1982. “Civilizing, Destructive, or Feeble? Rival Interpretations of Market Society.” Journal of Economic Litrature 4:1463–84.Google Scholar
Marglin, Stephen. 1963. “The Social Rate of Discount and the Optimal Rate of Investment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 1:95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikesell, Raymond. 1977. The Rate of Discount for Evaluating Public Projects. Washington D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Baron de. 1966. The Spirit of the Laws, translated by Nugent, T.. New York: Hafner Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1932. The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. 1972. The Government of Poland, translated by Kendall, Willmoore. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1937. The Wealth of Nations. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Sudgen, Robert, and Williams, Alan. 1978. The Principles of Practical Cost-Benefit Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar