Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T13:17:08.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SOCIAL CHOICE AND THE ARROW CONDITIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2014

Allan F. Gibbard
Allan F. Gibbard*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Arrow’s impossibility result stems chiefly from a combination of two requirements: independence and fixity. Independence says that the social choice is independent of individual preferences involving unavailable alternatives. Fixity says that the social choice is fixed by a social preference relation that is independent of what is available. Arrow found that requiring, further, that this relation be transitive yields impossibility. Here it is shown that allowing intransitive social indifference still permits only a vastly unsatisfactory system, a liberum veto oligarchy. Arrow’s argument for independence, though, undermines any rationale for fixity.

Type
Articles
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , November 2014 , pp. 269 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arrow, K. J. 1963. Social Choice and Individual Values, Second Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. 1967. Values and collective decision-making. In Philosophy, Politics and Society, Third Series, ed. Laslett, P. and Runciman, W. G., 215–232. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Davies, N. 1982. God’s Playground: A History of Poland, Volume I: The Origins to 1795. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Plato 1954. The Apology. In The Last Days of Socrates, translated by Tredennick, H., 45–76. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1970. Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco, CA: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
Weymark, J. A. 2014. An introduction to Allan Gibbard’s Harvard seminar paper, Economics and Philosophy 30: this issue.Google Scholar