Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:42:57.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rationing with time: time-cost ordeals’ burdens and distributive effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2020

Julie L. Rose Open the ORCID record for Julie L. Rose [Opens in a new window]
Julie L. Rose*
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College, 231 Silsby Hall, 3 Tuck Mall, HanoverNH, 03755, USA
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Individuals often face administrative hurdles in attempting to access health care, public programmes, and other legal statuses and entitlements. These ordeals are the products, directly or indirectly, of institutional and policy design choices. I argue that evaluating whether such ordeals are justifiable or desirable instruments of social policy depends on assessing, beyond their targeting effects, the process-related burdens they impose on those attempting to navigate them and these burdens’ distributive effects. I here examine specifically how ordeals that levy time costs reduce and constrain individuals’ free time, and how such time-cost ordeals may thereby create, deepen and compound disadvantages.

Keywords

economic ordealstargetingfree timedistributive justicesocial and political inequality
Type
Symposium Article
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 37 , Special Issue 1: Special Issue on Ethics of Economic Ordeals , March 2021 , pp. 50 - 63
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alatas, V., Banerjee, A., Hanna, R., Olken, B.A., Purnamasari, R. and Wai-Poi, M.. 2016. Self-targeting: evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. Journal of Political Economy 124, 371–427.10.1086/685299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alperovitz, G. 2005. America Beyond Capitalism: Reclaiming Our Wealth, Our Liberty, and Our Democracy. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. 1999. What is the point of equality? Ethics 109(2), 287–337.10.1086/233897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, S. 2017. Putting liberty in its place: Rawlsian liberalism without the liberalism. European Journal of Philosophy 26, 213–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A.B. 1995. On targeting social security: theory and western experience with family benefits. In Public Spending and the Poor: Theory and Evidence, ed. van de Walle, D. and Nead, K., 25–68. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, A.L. 2003. How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, E.F. 2018. The Political Value of Time: Citizenship, Duration, and Democratic Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108304283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupas, P., Hoffmann, V., Kremer, M. and Zwane, A.P.. 2016. Targeting health subsidies through a non-price mechanism: a randomized controlled trial in Kenya. Science 353, 889–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emens, E.F. 2015. Admin. Georgetown Law Journal 103, 1409–1481.Google Scholar
Emens, E.F. 2019. Life Admin. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Eyal, N., Romain, P.L. and Robertson, C.. 2018. Can rationing through inconvenience be ethical? Hastings Center Report 48, 10–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fabre, C. 2000. Social Rights under the Constitution: Government and the Decent Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabre, C. 2006. Whose Body is it Anyway? Justice and the Integrity of the Person. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley, M.M. 1979. The Process is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Gerstel, N. and Clawson, D.. 2015. Inequality in work time: gender and class stratify hours and schedules, flexibility, and unpredictability in jobs and families. Sociology Compass 9, 1094–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerstel, N. and Clawson, D.. 2018. Control over time: employers, workers, and families shaping work schedules. Annual Review of Sociology 44, 77–97.10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, L. 2008. Limited access: disparities in flexible work schedules and work-at-home. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 29, 86–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R.E. 1985. Erring on the side of kindness in social welfare policy. Policy Sciences 18, 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R.E., Rice, J.M., Parpo, A. and Eriksson, L.. 2008. Discretionary Time: A New Measure of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourevitch, A. 2015. From Slavery to the Cooperative Commonwealth: Labor and Republican Liberty in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gupta, S. 2017. Perils of the paperwork: the impact of information and application assistance on welfare program take-up in India. Working Paper. https://scholar.harvard.edu/sarikagupta/publications/mediation-deficit-when-information-isn%E2%80%99t-enough-take-welfare-programs.Google Scholar
Hamermesh, D.S. 2019. Spending Time: The Most Valuable Resource. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Herd, P. and Moynihan, D.P.. 2018. Administrative Burden: Policymaking by Other Means. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Hobbes, M., de Groot, W.T., van der Voet, E. and Sarkhel, S.. 2011. Freely disposable time: a time and money integrated measure of poverty and freedom. World Development 39, 2055–2068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunnicutt, B.K. 2013. Free Time: The Forgotten American Dream. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. 2019. The uneven distribution of discretion: parent monitoring and the rationing of school resources. Working paper. https://scholar.princeton.edu/rebeccajohnson/publications/uneven-distribution-discretion-parent-monitoring-and-rationing-school.Google Scholar
Maye, A. 2019. No-Vacation Nation, Revised. Washington, DC: Center for Economic and Policy Research.Google Scholar
Mettler, S. 2005. Soldiers to Citizens: The G.I. Bill and the Making of the Greatest Generation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mullainathan, S. and Shafir, E.. 2013. Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much. New York, NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Neufeld, B. 2017. Freedom, money and justice as fairness. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 16, 70–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, A.L. and Zeckhauser, R.J.. 1982. Targeting transfers through restrictions on recipients. American Economic Review 72, 372–377.Google Scholar
Olken, B.A. 2016. Hassles versus prices. Science 353, 864–865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patten, E. 2016. Racial, Gender Wage Gaps Persist in U.S. Despite Some Progress. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. 2012. On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. 2014. Just Freedom: A Moral Compass for a Complex World. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Presser, H.B. 2003. Working in a 24/7 Economy: Challenges for American Families. New York: Russel Sage.Google Scholar
Rakoff, T.D. 2002. A Time for Every Purpose: Law and the Balance of Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Revised ed. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, J.L. 2018. Nudge-proof: distributive justice and the ethics of nudging. Michigan Law Review 116, 1045–1066.Google Scholar
Robertson, C.T. 2015. Scaling cost-sharing to wages: how employers can reduce health spending and provide greater economic security. Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics 14, 239–295.Google Scholar
Rose, J.L. 2016. Free Time. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, J.L. 2017. Justice and the resource of time: a reply to Goodin, Terlazzo, von Platz, Stanczyk, and Lim. Law, Ethics and Philosophy 5, 105–121.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1995. The political economy of targeting. In Public Spending and the Poor: Theory and Evidence, ed. van de Walle, D. and Nead, K., 11–24. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Soss, J. 1999. Lessons of welfare: policy design, political learning, and political action. American Political Science Review 93, 363–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C.R. 2019. Sludge and ordeals. Duke Law Journal 68, 1843–1883.Google Scholar
Van Parijs, P. 1995. Real Freedom for All: What (If Anything) Can Justify Capitalism? Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Weisbrod, B.A. 1970. Collective action and the distribution of income: a conceptual approach. In Public Expenditure and Policy Analysis, ed. Haveman, R.H. and Margolis, J.. Chicago, IL: Markham.Google Scholar
White, S. 2003. The Civic Minimum: On the Rights and Obligations of Economic Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J.R., Masuda, Y.J. and Tallis, H.. 2016. A measure whose time has come: formalizing time poverty. Social Indicators Research 128, 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, J. 2015. Social equality, relative poverty and marginalised groups. In The Equal Society: Essays on Equality in Theory and Practice, ed. Hull, G., 21–41. London: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Wolff, J. and de-Shalit, A.. 2007. Disadvantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar