Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:21:25.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rational Choice, Itzhak Gilboa, MIT Press, 2010, xv + 158 pages.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2012

Olivier Roy*
Affiliation:
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bicchieri, C. and Muldoon, R. 2011. Social norms. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 Edition), ed. E.N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/Google Scholar
Brandenburger, A. 2007. The power of paradox: some recent developments in interactive epistemology. International Journal of Game Theory 35: 465492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. and Selten, R., eds. 2002. Bounded Rationality; The Adaptive Toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolodny, N. 2005. Why be rational? Mind 114: 455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, I. 1986. Hard Choices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myerson, R.B. 2008. Mechanism design. In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics Online. <http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/dictionary>CrossRef>Google Scholar
O'Shaughnessy, B. 1973. Trying (as the mental ‘pineal gland’). Journal of Philosophy 70: 365386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parikh, R. 2002. Social software. Synthese 132: 187211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, T.C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Way, J. 2010. The normativity of rationality. Philosophy Compass, 5: 10571068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar