Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T13:45:52.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PUNISHMENT JUSTIFIABLE AS A QUASI-TAX

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2015

David Gilboa
David Gilboa*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, UW Oshkosh, 800 Algoma Blvd., Oshkosh, WI 54901, USA. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

I argue that, since the legal order is a public good, an act of legal punishment may be viewed as the imposition of a kind of tax, which I label ‘a quasi-tax’. Once punishment is viewed as a quasi-tax, the traditionally opposed approaches to punishment may be reconciled, as both utility and retribution jointly justify an act of legal punishment. I discuss objections to my argument and I reply to them.

Keywords

Punishmentpublic goodsquasi-taxutilityretribution
Type
Articles
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , November 2015 , pp. 431 - 445
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allan, C. M. 1971. The Theory of Taxation. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Altman, A. 2001. Arguing About Law. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Benn, S. I. 1985. Punishment. In Punishment and Rehabilitation, ed. Murphy, J. G., 8–19. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Boonin, D. 2008. The Problem of Punishment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, E. K. and Browning, J. M.. 1989. Microeconomic Theory and Applications. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. and Pettit, P.. 1990. Not Just Deserts: A Republican Theory of Criminal Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. L. 1992. Risks and Wrongs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cooter, R. 1984. Prices and sanctions. 84 Columbia Law Review: 1523–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooter, R. and Ulen, T.. 2012. Law and Economics. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Dagger, R. 1993. Playing fair with punishment. Ethics 103: 473–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagger, R. 2008. Punishment as fair play. Res Publica 14: 259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimock, S. 2000. The natural law theory of St. Thomas Aquinas. In Philosophy of Law, ed. Feinberg, J. and Coleman, J. L., 19–32. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. H. 1979. The paradox of punishment. Philosophy and Public Affairs 9: 42–58.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1959–60. Prolegomenon to the principles of punishment. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 60: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. 1985. The right to punish. In Punishment and Rehabilitation, ed. Murphy, J. G., 20–23. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Keeton, W. P. 1984. Prosser and Keeton on Torts. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Musgrave, R. A. 1959. The Theory of Public Finance. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Pearce, D. W. ed. 1986. The MIT Dictionary of Modern Economics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, R.A. 1972. Economic Analysis of Law. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1955. Two concepts of rules. Philosophical Review 64: 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rostovtzeff, M. 1960. Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shafer-Landau, R. 2000. The failure of retributivism. In Philosophy of Law, ed. Feinberg, J. and Coleman, J. L., 769–779. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Ten, C. L. 1987. Crime, Guilt, and Punishment. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar