Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:51:14.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politics and Morality of Unequal Exchange: Emmanuel and Roemer, Analysis and Synthesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

David Schweickart
David Schweickart
Affiliation:
Loyola University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When the relative importance of the national exploitation from which a working class suffers through belonging to the proletariat diminishes continually as compared with that from which it benefits through belonging to a privileged nation, a moment comes when the aim of increasing the national income in absolute terms prevails over that of the relative share of one part of the nation over the other. From that point onward the principle of national solidarity ceases to be challenged in principle, however violent and radical the struggle over the sharing of the cake may be. Thereafter a de facto united front of the workers and capitalists of the well-to-do countries, directed against the poor nations, coexists with an internal trade-union struggle over the sharing of the loot. (Emmanuel, 1972, p. 180)

Type
Essays
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , April 1991 , pp. 13 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen. 1959. Capital and Interest, Vol. 1. South Holland, IL: Libertarian Press.Google Scholar
Bortkiewicz, Ladislas von. 1907. Zur Berichtigung der grundlegenden theoretischen Konstruktion von Marx im dritten Band des Kapital. Jahrbucher fur Nationalokonomie und Statisik 34(3): 319–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Janvry, Alain, and Kramer, Frank. 1979. “The Limits of Unequal Exchange.” Review of Radical Political Economics 11(4): 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmanuel, Arghiri. 1972. Unequal Exchange: A Study in the Imperialism of Trade. New York: Monthly Review Press. Originally published as L'echange ineqal (Paris: Librairie Francois Maspero, 1969).Google Scholar
Gibson, Bill. 1980. “Unequal Exchange: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Findings.” Review of Radical Political Economics 12(3): 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kravis, Irving. 1984. “Comparative Studies of National Income and Prices.” Journal of Economic Literature (03): 1–39.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1959. Critique of the Gotha Program. Moscow: Foreign Language Publishing House.Google Scholar
Roemer, John. 1982a. A General Theory of Exploitation and Class. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roemer, John. 1982b. “Property Relations Versus Surplus Value in Marxian Exploitation.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 11(4): 281–313.Google Scholar
Roemer, John. 1983. “Unequal Exchange, Labor Migration, and International Capital Flows: A Theoretical Synthesis.” In Marxism, Central Planning, and the Soviet Economy: Economic Essays in Honor of Alexander Erlich, edited by Desai, Padma, pp. 34–60. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Roemer, John. 1985. “Should Marxists Be Interested in Exploitation?” Philosophy and Public Affairs 14:30–65.Google Scholar
Wolff, Robert Paul. 1984. Understanding Marx: A Reconstruction and Critique of Capital. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar