Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:22:35.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Foundations of Hysteresis in Economic Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2009

Rod Cross
Rod Cross
Affiliation:
University of Strathclyde
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Hysteresis means literally “that which comes later,” being derived from the Greek verb ύστερέω. Thus, hysteresis effects, generally defined, are those that persist after the initial causes giving rise to the effects are removed.

During the course of the 1980s, it became increasingly fashionable to invoke hysteresis effects to explain economic phenomena. Two of the main areas of application were to unemployment and international trade. In the case of unemployment, distinctive features of labor markets, such as social norms that rule out wage-cutting in the face of rising unemployment, imply that “increases in unemployment have a direct impact on the ‘natural’ rate of unemployment” (Blanchard and Summers, 1988, p. 15). The implication for macroeconomic systems is that “temporary shocks can have a permanent effect on the level of employment” (Ibid., p. 307). In the case of international trade, hysteresis effects arise from the industrial economics of sunk costs: “the argument is that firms must incur sunk costs to enter new markets, and cannot recoup these costs if they exit.… thus foreign firms that entered the U.S. market when the dollar was high do not abandon their sunk cost investments when the dollar falls.” The implication for trade flows is “an effect which persists after the cause that brought it about has been removed” (Dixit, 1989, p. 205).

Type
Essays
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , April 1993 , pp. 53 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amable, B., Henry, J., Lordon, F., and Topol, R.. 1991. “‘Strong’ Hysteresis: an Application to Foreign Trade.” Paris: Observatoire Français des Conjonctures Economiques (O.F.C.E.)Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. 1962. “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing.” Review of Economic Studies 29:155–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. J., Harris, T., and Marschak, J.. 1951. “Optimal Inventory Policy.” Econometrica XIX:205–72.Google Scholar
Arthur, W. B. 1989. “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events.” Economic Journal 99, 03:116–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertola, G., and Caballero, R. J.. 1990. “Kinked Adjustment Costs and Aggregate Dynamics.” NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1990. Edited by Blanchard, O. J. and Fischer, S.Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Blanchard, O. J., and Khan, C.. 1981. “The Solution of Linear Difference Models Under Rational Expectations.” Econometrica 48:1305–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, O. J., and Summers, L. H.. 1988. “Hysteresis and the European Unemployment Problem.” Reprinted in Unemployment, Hysteresis and the Natural Rate Hypothesis, edited by Cross, R., pp. 306–64. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Buiter, W. H. 1981. “A Note on the Solution of a Two-Point Boundary Value Problem Frequently Encountered in Rational Expectations Models.” N.B.E.R. Technical Working Paper No. 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caballero, R. J., and Engel, E. M. R. A.. 1991. “The S-s Economy: Aggregation, Speed of Convergence and Monetary Policy Effectiveness.” Econometrica 59, 11: 1659–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplin, A., and Leahy, J.. 1991. “State-Dependent Pricing and the Dynamics of Money and Output.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. CVI, 08:683–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, R. (editor). 1988. Unemployment, Hysteresis and the Natural Rate Hypothesis. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cross, R. (editor). 1991a. “Alternative Accounts of Equilibrium Unemployment.” In Appraising Modern Economics: Studies in the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, Blaug, M. and de Marchi, N., editors, pp. 294–323. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Cross, R. (editor). (1991b). “The NAIRU: Not An Interesting Rate of Unemployment?” University of Strathclyde, October.Google Scholar
Cross, R. and Allan, A.. 1988. “On the History of Hysteresis.” In Unemployment, Hysteresis and the Natural Rate Hypothesis, edited by Cross, R., pp. 26–40. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Diamond, P. 1984. A Search Equilibrium Approach to the Micro Foundations of Macroeconomics. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Dixit, A. 1989. “Hysteresis, Import Penetration and Exchange Rate Pass-Through.” Quarterly Journal of Economics CIV. 2, 05:205–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, A. 1992. “Investment and Hysteresis.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 6.1, Winter:107–32.Google Scholar
Elster, J. 1976. “A Note on Hysteresis in the Social Sciences.” Synthese 33:371–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, A. W. 1939. The Man of Room 40: The Life of Sir Alfred Ewing. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Ewing, J. A., 1881a. “The Effects of Stress on the Thermoelectric Quality of Metals.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 32:399–402.Google Scholar
Ewing, J. A., 1881b. “On the Production of Transient Electric Currents in Iron and Steel Conductors by Twisting Them When Magnetised or by Magnetising Them When Twisted.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 33:21–23.Google Scholar
Ewing, J. A., 1885. “Experimental Researches in Magnetism.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 17611:523–640.Google Scholar
Ewing, J. A., 1893. Magnetic Induction in Iron and Other Metals. London: D. Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1968. “The Role of Monetary Policy.” American Economic Review 58.1, March:1–17.Google Scholar
Fuller, W. A. 1976. Introduction to Statistical Time Series Analysis. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1966. Analytical Economics: Issues and Problems. Harvard: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1971. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Harvard: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giavazzi, F., and Wyplosz, C.. 1985. “The Zero Root Problem: A Note on the Dynamic Determination of the Stationary Equilibrium in Linear Models.” Review of Economic Studies. LII:353–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glazebrook, R. T. 1935. “James Alfred Ewing, 1855–1935.” Obituary Notices of the Royal Society of London 1:475–92.Google Scholar
Haavelmo, T. 1944. “The Probability Approach in Econometrics.” Economica Supplement 12 07:viii–115.Google Scholar
Hahn, F. 1987. “Information, Dynamics and Equilibrium.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 34.4, November:321–24.Google Scholar
Holt, C. C. et al. , 1960. Planning, Production, Inventories and Work Force. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Jackson, F., and Pettit, P.. 1992. “In Defense of Explanatory Ecumenism.” Economics and Philosophy 8:1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1933. “A Classifactory Note on the Determinateness of Equilibrium.” Review of Economic Studies 11:122–36.Google Scholar
Kemp, M. C., and Wan, J. Y. Jr., 1974. “Hysteresis of Long-Run Equilibrium from Realistic Adjustment Costs.” In Trade, Stability and Macroeconomics, edited by Horwich, G., and Samuelson, P. A., pp. 175–89. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Krasnosel'skii, M. A., and Pokrovskii, A. V.. 1983. Sistemy's Gisteresisom. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Krasnosel'skii, M. A., and Pokrovskii, A. V.. 1989. Systems with Hysteresis. Translated by Niezgōdka, Marek. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, A. 1890. Principles of Economics, 1st edition. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mayergoyz, I. D. 1985. “Hysteresis Models from the Mathematical and Control Theory Points of View.” Journal of Applied Physics 57.8.2B:3803–05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayergoyz, I. D. 1991. Mathematical Models of Hysteresis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelps, E. S. 1967. “Phillips Curves, Expectations of Inflation and Optimal Unemployment Over Time.” Economica 34.3:254–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelps, E. S. 1972. Inflation Policy and Unemployment Theory. London: Macmil.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. 1956. The Accumulation of Capital. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1972. “Some Notions of Causality and Teleology in Economics” (1965) and “What Classical and Neoclassical Monetary Theory Really Was” (1968). In The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson Vol. III, edited by Merton, R. C., pp. 246–71. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scudo, F. M., and Ziegler, J. R.. 1978. The Golden Age of Theoretical Ecology 1923–1940. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, R. M. 1990. The Labour Market as a Social Institution. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stewart, I. 1989. Does God Play Dice? London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Summers, L. H. 1988. “Should Keynesian Economics Dispense with the Phillips Curve?” In Unemployment, Hysteresis, and the Natural Rate Hypothesis, edited by Cross, R., pp. 11–25. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Volterra, V. 1927. “Variazoni e fluttuazioni del numero d'individui in specie animali conviventi.” R Comitato Talassografico Italiano. Memoria 131:1–142. Translated in The Golden Age of Theoretical Ecology 1923–1940, by F. M. Scudo, and J. R. Ziegler, pp. 47–72. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Wyplosz, C. 1987. “Comments.” In The Fight Against Unemployment, edited by Layard, R. and Calmfors, L., pp. 186–90. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar