Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T12:56:18.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Moral Aggregation, Iwao Hirose. Oxford University Press, 2015, xiii + 234 pages.

Review products

Moral Aggregation, Iwao Hirose. Oxford University Press, 2015, xiii + 234 pages.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2015

Susanne Burri*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK. email: [email protected]. URL: www.susanneburri.ch.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Well-being or desire satisfaction are examples for such factors.

2 To think of the WCC as a counterexample to formal aggregation, Hirose must assume that in the WCC, we judge it wrong not to bring about the best possible consequences.

3 While this view has problems of its own, this need not concern me here, as I am merely suggesting that our intuitions about the WCC are consistent with formal aggregation.

4 A complete and transitive order ≿ on some set X is continuous iff for every yX, the sets {xX: xy} and {xX: xy} are closed.

5 Hirose (39–40) makes the stronger claim that discontinuous orderings can never be represented by real-valued functions and are thus by definition inconsistent with formal aggregation. This is incorrect. If–-as Hirose (23, fn. 3) assumes – only countably many states of affairs need to be ranked, it is possible to represent any complete and transitive order with a real-valued function.

6 In light of the fact that Hirose defends formal aggregation as a constraint on moral theories, I take it that he wishes to reject the theories that violate it.