Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:07:39.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Market as a Creative Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

James M. Buchanan  and
Viktor J. Vanberg
James M. Buchanan
Affiliation:
George Mason University
Viktor J. Vanberg
Affiliation:
George Mason University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Contributions in modern theoretical physics and chemistry on the behavior of nonlinear systems, exemplified by Ilya Prigogine's work on the thermodynamics of open systems (Prigogine and Stengers, 1984), attract growing attention in economics (Anderson, Arrow, and Pines, 1988; Arthur, 1990; Baumol and Benhabib, 1989; Mirowski, 1990; Radzicki, 1990). Our purpose here is to relate the new orientation in the natural sciences to a particular nonorthodox strand of thought within economics. All that is needed for this purpose is some appreciation of the general thrust of the enterprise, which involves a shift of perspective from the determinism of conventional physics (which presumably inspired the neoclassical research program in economics) to the nonteleological open-endedness, creative, and nondetermined nature of evolutionary processes.

Type
Essays
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , October 1991 , pp. 167 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, Peter M. 1985. “Towards a New Science of Complex Systems.” In The Science and Praxis of Complexity, by Aida, S. et al. , pp. 268–97. Tokyo: The United Nations University.Google Scholar
Allen, Peter M. 1988. “Evolution, Innovation and Economics.” In Technical Change and Economic Theory, edited by Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., and Soete, L., pp. 95–119. London: Pinter Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Anderson, Philip W., Arrow, Kenneth J., and Pines, David (editors). 1988. The Economy as an Evolving Complex System. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Arthur, W. Brian. 1990. “Positive Feedbacks in the Economy.” Scientific American 262:92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, Norman. 1982. “The Tradition of Spontaneous Order.” The Literature of Liberty 5:7–58.Google Scholar
Baumol, William, and Benhabib, Stephen. 1989. “Chaos: Significance, Mechanism, and Economic Applications.” Journal of Economic Issues 3:77–106.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M. 1969. Cost and Choice – An Inquiry in Economic Theory. Chicago: Markham Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M. 1977. “Politics and Science.” In Freedom in Constitutional Contract, by Buchanan, J. M., pp. 64–77. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M. 1982. “Order Defined in the Process of Its Emergence.” The Literature of Liberty 5:5.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M. 1985. “The Potential for Tyranny in Politics as Science.” In Liberty, Market and State, by Buchanan, J. M., pp. 40–54. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M. 1987. “L. S. E. Cost Theory in Retrospect.” In Economics – Between Predictive Science and Moral Philosophy, by Buchanan, J. M., pp. 141–51. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Fehl, Ulrich. 1986. “Spontaneous Order and the Subjectivity of Expectations: A Contribution to the Lachmann-O'Driscoll Problem.” In Subjectivism, Intelligibility, and Economic Understanding, edited by Kirzner, I. M., pp. 72–86. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1978. “Competition as a Discovery Procedure.” In New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics, and the History of Ideas, by Hayek, F. A., pp. 179–90. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, James. 1960. Ulysses. London: Bodley Head.Google Scholar
Kirzner, Israel M. 1985. Discovery and the Capitalist Process. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kirzner, Israel M. 1989. Discovery, Capitalism, Distributive Justice. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lachmann, Ludwig M. 1976. “From Mises to Shackle: An Essay on Austrian Economics and the Kaleidic Society.” Journal of Economic Literature 14:54–62.Google Scholar
Lachmann, Ludwig M. 1977. “Professor Shackle on the Economic Significance of Time.” In Capital, Expectations, and the Market Process, by Lachmann, L. M., pp. 81–93. Kansas City, MO: Sheed Andrews and McMeel.Google Scholar
Littlechild, Stephen C. 1979. “Comment: Radical Subjectivism or Radical Subversion.” In Time, Uncertainty and Disequilibrium: Exploration of Austrian Themes, edited by Rizzo, M., pp. 32–49. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Littlechild, Stephen C. 1983. “Subjectivism and Method in Economics.” In Beyond Positive Economics, edited by Wiseman, J., pp. 38–49. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlechild, Stephen C. 1986. “Three Types of Market Process.” In Economics as a Process – Essays in the New Institutional Economics, edited by Langlois, Richard N., pp. 27–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought – Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip. 1990. “From Mandelbrot to Chaos in Economic Theory.” Southern Economic Journal 57:289–307.Google Scholar
O'Driscoll, Gerald P., and Rizzo, Mario J.. 1985. The Economics of Time and Ignorance. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael. 1951. The Logic of Liberty. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl R. 1957. The Poverty of Historicism. Boston: The Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl R. 1982. The Open Universe – An Argument for Indeterminism. Totowa, NJ: Rowan and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Prigogine, Ilya. 1985. “New Perspectives on Complexity.” In The Science and Praxis of Complexity, by Aida, S. et al. , pp. 107–18. Tokyo: The United Nations University.Google Scholar
Prigogine, Ilya. 1986. “Science, Civilization and Democracy.” Futures 18:493–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prigogine, Ilya, and Stengers, Isabelle. 1984. Order out of Chaos – Man's New Dialogue with Nature. Toronto: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Radzicki, Michael J. 1990. “Institutional Dynamics, Deterministic Chaos, and Self-Organizing Systems.” Journal of Economic Issues 24:57–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackle, G. L. S. 1979. Imagination and the Nature of Choice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Shackle, G. L. S. 1981. “Comments.” In Subjectivist Economics – The New Austrian School, by Shand, A. H., pp. 59–67. Oxford: The Pica Press.Google Scholar
Shackle, G. L. S. 1983. “The Bounds of Unknowledge.” In Beyond Positive Economics, edited by Wiseman, J., pp. 28–37. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tullock, Gordon (editor). 1983. The Simons' Syllabus, by Simons, Henry Calvert. Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Google Scholar
Vaughn, Karen I. 1990. “Profits, Alertness and Imagination” (review of I. M. Kirzner's Discovery, Capitalism, and Distributive Justice). Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines 1:183–88.Google Scholar
Wicken, Jeffrey S. 1987. Evolution, Thermodynamics, and Information – Extending the Darwinian Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiseman, Jack. 1989. Cost, Choice, and Political Economy. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, Jack. 1990. “Principles of Political Economy – An Outline Proposal, Illustrated by Application to Fiscal Feralism.” Constitutional Political Economy 1:101–27.Google Scholar
Witt, Ulrich. 1985. “Coordination of Individual Economic Activities as an Evolving Process of Self-Organization.” Economie Appliquée 37:569–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar