Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:42:47.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LIFE AND DEATH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2015

Ken Binmore
Ken Binmore*
Affiliation:
Philosophy Department, Bristol University, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1TB, UK. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

What is the value of a life? How should we regard death? This paper uses the methods of economics to defend some of the views of Epicurus against the utilitarian approach that welfare economics takes for granted.

Keywords

Epicurusataraxiatiming of decisionsutilitarianismmodelling death
Type
Articles
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 75 - 97
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bentham, J. 1987 [1789]. An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. In Utilitarianism and Other Essays, ed. Ryan, A., 65–112. Harmondsworth, UK: PenguinGoogle Scholar
Binmore, K. 2005. Natural Justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, K. 2007. Playing for Real. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, K. 2009. Rational Decisions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. 1987. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eagleman, D. 2008. Human time perception and its illusions. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 18: 131–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaskin, J. 1995. The Epicurean Philosophers. London: Everyman Library.Google Scholar
Harris, J. 1998. The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn Out the Way they Do. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Henry, J. 2009. Philodemus on Death. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1978 [1739]. A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
James, W. 1890. Principles of Psychology. New York, NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 2007 [1788]. Critique of Judgement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Long, A. and Sedley, D.. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers: Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Milnor, J. 1954. Games against nature. In Decision Processes, ed. Thrall, R., Coombs, C. and Davies, R., 49–59. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 1979. Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. 1986. Overpopulation and the quality of life. In Applied Ethics, ed. Singer, P.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1972. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 2000. Development as Freedom. NewYork, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
Spinoza, B. de. 2009 [1677]. Ethics. New York, NY: Classic Books International.Google Scholar
Stern, N. 2007. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O.. 1944. The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Warren, J. 2004. Facing Death: Epicurus and his Critics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar