Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:34:25.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kuhn's Paradigms and Neoclassical Economics: Reply to Dow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

George Argyrous
George Argyrous
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comments
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , April 1994 , pp. 123 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

reference

Argyrous, G. 1992. “Kuhn's Paradigms and Neoclassical Economics.” Economics and Philosophy 8:231–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argyrous, G., and Sethi, R.. 1993. “Veblen, the Theory of Evolution and the Evolution of Theory.” Unpublished.Google Scholar
David, P. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” American Economic Review: and Proceedings 75:332–37.Google Scholar
Dow, S. C. 1985. Macroeconomic Thought: A Methodological Approach. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dow, S. C. “Kuhn's Paradigms and Neoclassical Economics: A Comment.” Economics and Philosophy 10:119–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T. 1970. “Reflections on my Critics.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A., pp. 231–78. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodewijks, J. 1989. “Dow's Macroeconomic Thought: A Methodological Approach: Review Essay.” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 6:261–68.Google Scholar
Lodewijks, J. “Relevance, Scholarship and the Historian of Economics: Some Methodological Considerations.” A paper presented at the Writing the History of Economics Symposium, University of Sydney, February 12.Google Scholar