Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:51:30.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrative Social Contracts Theory

A Communitarian Conception of Economic Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Thomas Donaldson  and
Thomas W. Dunfee
Thomas Donaldson
Affiliation:
Georgetown University
Thomas W. Dunfee
Affiliation:
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Difficult moral issues in economic life, such as evaluating the impact of hostile takeovers and plant relocations or determining the obligations of business to the environment, constitute the raison d'etre of business ethics. Yet, while the ultimate resolution of such issues clearly requires detailed, normative analysis, a shortcoming of business ethics is that to date it has failed to develop an adequate normative theory.1 The failing is especially acute when it results in an inability to provide a basis for fine-grained analyses of issues. Both general moral theories and stakeholder theory seem incapable of expressing the moral complexity necessary to provide practical normative guidance for many business ethics contexts.

Type
Essays
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , April 1995 , pp. 85 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Axelrod, Robert. 1986. ‘An evolutionary approach to norms’. American Political Science Review, 80(4):1095–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Michael. 1992. ‘The moral legislature: contracrualism without an Archimedean point’. Ethics, 102(2):303–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas and Preston., Lee E. 1995. ‘The stakeholder conception of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications’. Academy of Management Review, 20:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas. 1991. ‘Kant's global rationalism’. In Traditions of Ethics in International Affairs, Chapter 7. Terence, Nardin (ed.). Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas. 1989. The Ethics of International Business. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas. 1982. Corporations and Morality. Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
Drucker, Peter. 1981. ‘Ethical chic’. Forbes, 128:160–2Google Scholar
Dunfee, Thomas W. 1991. ‘Business ethics and extant social contracts’. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1(1):23–51Google Scholar
Dunfee, Thomas W. and Maurer, Virginia C.. 1992. ‘Corporate attorney whistle blowing: devising a proper standard’. Business & Professional Ethics journal, 11(3 and 4): 3–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Anthony. 1991. ‘The idea of utilitarianism’. In Traditions of Ethics in International Affairs, Chapter 8. Terence, Nardin(ed.). Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. Edward. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman PressGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Samuel. 1990. ‘Reason and agreement in social contract views’. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 19(2):122–57Google Scholar
Gauthier, David. 1986. Morals by Agreement. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, David. 1985. ‘The unity of reason: a subversive reinterpretation of Kant’. Ethics, 96:74–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gert, Bernard. 1988. Morality, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Goodpaster, Kenneth E. 1991. ‘Business ethics and stakeholder analysis’. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1:53–73Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent. 1989. Conflicts of Law and Morality. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hardin, Russell. 1988. Morality Within the Limits of Reason. University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. 1953. ‘Of the original contract’. In David Hume's Political Essays, pp. 43–63. Charles, W. Hendel (ed.). Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1964. The Metaphysical Principles of Virtue. Trans. James Ellington. Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Lewis, David K. 1969. Convention. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Maclntyre, Alisdair C. 1981. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. University of Notre Dame PressGoogle Scholar
Moralogy, Institute of. 1987. An Outline of Moralogy. English Edition. Institute of Moralogy, Kashiwa-Shi, JapanGoogle Scholar
Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Phillip. 1990. ‘Virtus normativa: rational choice perspectives’. Ethics, 100:725–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, Lee E. and Sapienza, Harry J.. 1990. ‘Stakeholder management and corporate performance’. The Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19:361–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1975. ‘Fairness to goodness’. Philosophical Review, 84:536e-54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Harvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Henry S. 1990. ‘Specifying norms as a way to resolve concrete ethical problems’. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 19(4):279–310Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael. 1982. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, Leigh S. 1983. ‘Toward Pepitone's vision of a normative social psychology: what is a social norm?’ The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 4(2):275–94Google Scholar
Shue, Henry. 1980. Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 1979. Moral Principles and Political Obligations. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
United Nations. 1990. Letter dated 31 May 1990 from Chairman of Commission on Transnational Corporations to the President of the Economic and Social CouncilGoogle Scholar
United Nations. 1948. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of Justice. Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1992. ‘Moral minimalism’. In From the Twilight of Probability: Ethics and Politics, pp. 1–14. William, R. Shea and Antonio, Spadafora (eds.). Science History PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Macmillan CompanyGoogle Scholar