Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T17:15:48.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imperfect Choice and Self-Stabilizing Rules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Ronald A. Heiner
Ronald A. Heiner
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A recent paper by David Levy (1987) focuses on “utility enhancing consumption constraints.” Levy concludes by noting that his analysis stays within standard utility maximizing theory, in contrast to my analysis of rule-governed behavior (Heiner, 1983, 1985a, 1985b, 1986, 1988a, 1988b, 1988c) which allows imperfect decisions that don't always maximize utility. I wish to show how our two theories can be integrated, thereby representing complementary, rather than conflicting, explanations. In the process, I argue that imperfect decisions are an essential factor in the stability of any rule that constrains freedom of choice. I also briefly discuss certain intrinsic problems with achieving “self-stabilizing” rules applied to moral teachings.

Type
Essays
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , April 1989 , pp. 19 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Heiner, Ronald A. 1983. “The Origin of Predictable Behavior.” American Economic Review 73:560–95.Google Scholar
Heiner, Ronald A. 1985a. “On Reinterpreting the Foundations of Risk and Utility Theory.” The Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton.Google Scholar
Heiner, Ronald A. 1985b. “Uncertainty, Signal Detection Experiments, and Modeling Behavior.” In The New Institutional Economics, edited by Langlois, R.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heiner, Ronald A. 1986. “Imperfect Decisions and the Law: On the Evolution of Legal Precedent and Rules.” Journal of Legal Studies 15:227–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiner, Ronald A. 1988a. “Imperfect Decisions in Organizations: Toward a Theory of Internal Structure.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 9:25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiner, Ronald A. 1988b. “The Necessity of Imperfect Decisions.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 10:29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiner, Ronald A. 1988c. “Origin of Predictable Dynamic Behavior.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Heiner, Ronald A. 1988d. “Imperfect Decisions, Evolutionary Stability, and Predictable Behavior: The Origin of Rules Over Flexible Optimizing.” In The Quantitative Analysis of Behavior, edited by Commons, Michael and Herrnstein, Richard. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Levy, David. 1988. “Utility-Enhancing Consumption Constraints,” Economics and Philosophy 4:69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar