Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:03:36.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IDENTITY, REASON AND CHOICE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2014

Mozaffar Qizilbash
Mozaffar Qizilbash*
Affiliation:
University of York, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In criticizing communitarian views of justice, Amartya Sen argues that identity is not merely a matter of discovery but an object of reasoned choice subject to constraints. Distinguishing three notions of identity – self-perception, perceived identity and social affiliation – I claim that the relevant constraints implied by this argument are minimal. Some of Sen's arguments about perceived identity and social context do not establish any further constraints. Sen also argues that a model of multiculturalism and some forms of education can restrict, or fail to promote, reasoned and informed identity choice. This argument is better understood in the light of Sen's work on capability and justice, notably his concern with ways in which underdogs can adapt and his emphasis on public reasoning. It highlights limitations on information and opportunities for reasoning. I suggest that these lead to genuine constraints on (reasoned and informed) identity choice. The paper focuses on Sen's work, though its claims are also relevant to George Akerlof and Rachel Kranton's analysis of identity.

Type
Articles
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 30 , Issue 1: ‘Themes from the Work of Amartya Sen: Identity, Rationality, and Justice’ , March 2014 , pp. 11 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Afshar, H., Aitken, R. and Franks, M.. 2005. Feminisms, Islamophobia and identities. Political Studies 53: 262–283.Google Scholar
Akerlof, G. and Kranton, R.. 2000. Economics and identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics 105: 715–753.Google Scholar
Akerlof, G. and Kranton, R.. 2002. Identity and schooling: some lessons for the economics of education. Journal of Economic Literature 40: 1167–1201.Google Scholar
Akerlof, G. and Kranton, R.. 2005. Identity and the economics of organizations. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19: 9–32.Google Scholar
Akerlof, G. and Kranton, R.. 2010. Identity Economics: How Our Identities Shape Our Work, Wages and Well-being. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Alkire, S. 2002. Valuing Freedoms: Sen's Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alkire, S. 2008. Using the capability approach: prospective and evaluative analyses. In The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Applications, ed. Comim, F., Qizilbash, M. and Alkire, S., 26–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Appiah, K. 2005. The Ethics of Identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Appiah, K. 2008. Bending towards justice. Journal of Human Development 9: 343–355.Google Scholar
Broome, J. 1991. Utility. Economics and Philosophy 7: 1–9.Google Scholar
Davis, J. 2006. Social identity strategies in recent economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 13: 371–390.Google Scholar
Deneulin, S. 2008. Beyond individual freedom and agency: structures of living together in the capability approach to development. In The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Applications, ed. Comim, F., Qizilbash, M. and Alkire, S., 105–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gore, C. 1997. Irreducibly social goods and the informational basis of Sen's capability approach. Journal of International Development 9: 235–250.Google Scholar
Kirman, A. and Teschl, M.. 2006. Searching for identity in the capability space. Journal of Economic Methodology 13: 299–325.Google Scholar
Layard, R. 2005. Happiness. Lessons from a New Science. London: Allen Lane, Penguin.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1988. The Subjection of Women, ed. Okin, S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1988. Nature, function and capability: Aristotle on political distribution. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 6 (Suppl.): 145–184.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1990. Aristotelian social democracy. In Liberalism and the Good, ed. Douglass, B., Mara, G. and Richardson, H., 203–252. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1992. Human functioning and social justice. In defence of Aristotelian essentialism. Political Theory 20: 202–246.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1995. Human capabilities, female human beings. In Women, Culture and Development: A Study of Human Capabilities, ed. Nussbaum, M. and Glover, J., 61–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1998. The good as discipline, the good as freedom. In Ethics of Consumption: the Good Life, Justice and Global Stewardship, ed. Crocker, D. and Linden, T., 312–341. Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2000. Women and Human Development: the Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2003. Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics 9: 33–59.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality and Species-Membership. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2011. Creating Capabilities: the Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. and Sen, A.. 1989. Internal criticism and Indian rationalist traditions. In Relativism, Interpretation and Confrontation, ed. Krauz, M., 229–325. Notre-Dame, IN: University of Notre-Dame Press.Google Scholar
Proust, M. 1992. In Search of Lost Time: Volume 4. Sodom and Gomorrah, transl. Scott Moncrieff, C. and Kilmartin, T.. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Qizilbash, M. 1998. The concept of well-being. Economics and Philosophy 14: 51–73.Google Scholar
Qizilbash, M. 2006. Capability, happiness and adaptation in Sen and J.S. Mill. Utilitas 18: 20–32.Google Scholar
Qizilbash, M. 2007. Social choice and individual capabilities. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6: 169–192.Google Scholar
Qizilbash, M. 2009a. The adaptation problem, evolution and normative economics. In Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen, ed. Basu, K. and Kanbur, R., 50–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Qizilbash, M. 2009b. Identity, community and justice: locating Amartya Sen's work on identity. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8: 251–266.Google Scholar
Qizilbash, M. 2011a. Sugden's critique of the capability approach. Utilitas 23: 25–51.Google Scholar
Qizilbash, M. 2011b. Sugden's critique of the capability approach and the dangers of libertarian paternalism. International Review of Economics 58: 21–42.Google Scholar
Qizilbash, M. 2012. Utilitarianism, ‘adaptation’ and paternalism. In Adaptation, Poverty and Development: The Dynamics of Subjective Well-Being, ed. Clark, D., 35–60. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Robeyns, I. 2003. Sen's capability approach and gender inequality: selecting relevant capabilities. Feminist Economics 9: 61–92.Google Scholar
Robeyns, I. 2008. Sen's capability approach and feminist concerns. In The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Applications, ed. Comim, F., Qizilbash, M. and Alkire, S., 82–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. 1998. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sartre, J-P. 1954. Reflections sur la Question Juive. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1980. ‘Equality of what? In Tanner Lectures in Human Values, ed. McMurrin, S., 197–220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1985. Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1991. Utility: ideas and terminology. Economics and Philosophy 7: 277–283.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1992. Inequality Re-examined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1993. Capability and well-being. In The Quality of Life, ed. Nussbaum, M. and Sen, A., 30–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1998. Reason before Identity: The Romanes Lecture for 1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 2000. Other people – beyond identity. The New Republic, December 18.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 2002a. Rationality and Freedom. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 2002b. Symposium on Development as Freedom: Response to Commentaries. Studies in Comparative International Development 37: 78–86.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 2002c. Open and closed impartiality. Journal of Philosophy 99: 445–469.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (in conversation with Agarwal, B., Humphries, J. and Robeyns, I.). 2003. Continuing the conversation. Feminist Economics 9: 319–332.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 2005a. The Argumentative Indian: Writings on Indian History, Culture and Identity. London: Allen Lane, Penguin.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 2005b. Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development 6: 151–166.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 2006a. Identity and Violence: the Illusion of Destiny. London: Allen Lane, Penguin.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 2006b. Reason, freedom and well-being. Utilitas 18: 80–96.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 2006c. What do we want from a theory of justice? Journal of Philosophy 103: 215–238.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 2009a. The fog of identity. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8: 285–288.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 2009b. The Idea of Justice. London: Allen Lane, Penguin.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 2014. Justice and identity. Economics and Philosophy 30: 1–10.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. 2006. What we desire, what we have reason to desire, whatever we might desire: Mill and Sen on the value of opportunity. Utilitas 18: 33–51.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. 2008. Capability, happiness, and opportunity. In Capabilities and Happiness ed. Bruni, L., Comim, F. and Pugno, M., 299–322. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. 2010. Opportunity as mutual advantage. Economics and Philosophy 26: 46–68.Google Scholar
Stewart, F. and Deneulin, S.. 2002. Amartya Sen's contribution to development thinking. Studies in Comparative International Development 37: 63–70.Google Scholar
Teschl, M. and Derobert, L.. 2008. Does identity matter? On the relevance of identity and interaction for capabilities. In The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Applications, ed. Comim, F., Qizilbash, M. and Alkire, S., 125–156. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar