Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T16:12:16.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Final Reply to Professor Schweickart

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

N. Scott Arnold
Affiliation:
University of Alabama, Birmingham

Extract

Since Schweickart asserts that I have not addressed his main argument, let me consider briefly the four claims he advances at the beginning of his second reply.

Regarding 1: To argue, as I have, that there would be a strong tendency for market socialism to degenerate into capitalism, it is necessary to spell out carefully what capitalism is. Following Marx, I defined capitalism as a system in which the workers do not control the means of production and the workers sell their labor power as a commodity. As G.A. Cohen has pointed out (Cohen, 1978, pp. 219–23), this definition can be given a rechtsfrei characterization in terms of effective powers over means of production and labor power. Actual legal arrangements are not the issue. In my original paper, I never said that the workers would sell the means of production. Thus 1 is irrelevant. The real questions are: (a) Who effectively controls the means of production? (b) Who effectively gets the profits? If the answer to both of these questions is, “Not the workers,” it follows that the workers are effectively proletarians and the system is a form of capitalism.

Type
Discussions
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cohen, G.A. 1978. Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defence. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Farkas, R.P. 1975. Yugoslav Economic Development and Political Change: The Relationship Between Economic Managers and Policy-Making Elites. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Milenkovitch, D.D. 1971. Plan and Market in Yugoslav Economic Thought. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mueller, D. 1979. Public Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schweickart, David. 1987. “A Reply to Arnold's Reply.” Economics and Philosophy 3:331–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar