Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T21:33:09.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ethical Limitations of the Market

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Elizabeth Anderson
Elizabeth Anderson
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A distinctive feature of modern capitalist societies is the tendency of the market to take over the production, maintenance, and distribution of goods that were previously produced, maintained, and distributed by nonmarket means. Yet, there is a wide range of disagreement regarding the proper extent of the market in providing many goods. Labor has been treated as a commodity since the advent of capitalism, but not without significant and continuing challenges to this arrangement. Other goods whose production for and distribution on the market are currently the subject of dispute include sexual intercourse, human blood, and human body parts such as kidneys. How can we determine which goods are properly subjects of market transactions and which are not? The purpose of this article is to propose a theory of what makes economic goods differ from other kinds of goods, which can help to answer this question.

Type
Essays
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , October 1990 , pp. 179 - 205
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akerlof, George. 1982. “Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchanges.” Quarterly journal of Economics 97:543–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atiyah, P. S. 1979. The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Anthony C. 1981. Resource and Environmental Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Fred. 1976. Social Limits to Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1977. The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before its Triumph. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. 1977. The Transformation of American Law: 1780–1860. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hyde, Lewis. 1983. The Gift: Imagination and the Erotic Life of Property. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Jane. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Kelman, Steven. 1986. “A Case for In-Kind Transfers.” Economics and Philosophy 2:55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. 1967. The Gift. Translated by Cunnison, Ian. New York: W. W. NortonGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Benjamin. 1969. The Idea of Usury: From Tribal Brotherhood to Universal Otherhood. 2nd ed., enlarged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert, 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1982. “Social Unity and Primary Goods.” In Utilitarianism and Beyond, edited by Sen, Amartya and Williams, Bernard, pp. 159–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rothbard, Murray. 1978. For a New Liberty. New York: Collier (Macmillan). Revised edition of first Collier edition.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. 1972. Stone Age Economics. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas, 1975. “Preference and Urgency.” Journal of Philosophy 72:655–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzenbach, Sibyl, 1990. “Contractarians and Feminists Debate Prostitution.” NYU Review of Law and Social Change. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Sheffrin, Steven. 1978. “Habermas, Depoliticization, and Consumer Theory.” Journal of Economic Issues 7:785–97.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1978. The Philosophy of Money. Translated by Bottomore, Tom and Frisby, David. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter. 1973. “Altruism and Commerce: A Defense of Titmuss Against Arrow.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 2:312–20.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1985. Philosophical Papers. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1987. “The Political Consequences of Communitarianism.” Lecture delivered at Harvard University, February 12, 1987.Google Scholar
Thurow, Lester. 1977. “Government Expenditures: Cash or In-Kind Aid?” In Markets and Morals, edited by Dworkin, Gerald, Bermant, Gordon, and Brown, Peter, pp. 85–106. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Titmuss, Richard M. 1971. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of Justice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1968. Economy and Society. 2 vols. Edited by Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar