Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:43:01.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

COSMOPOLITANISM AND COMPETITION: PROBING THE LIMITS OF EGALITARIAN JUSTICE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2016

David Wiens*
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego, Department of Political Science, 9500 Gilman Dr., 323 SSB #0521, La Jolla, CA, 92092-0521, USA. Email: [email protected]. URL: www.dwiens.com.

Abstract:

This paper develops a novel competition criterion for evaluating institutional schemes. Roughly, this criterion says that one institutional scheme is normatively superior to another to the extent that the former engenders more widespread political competition than the latter. I show that this criterion should be endorsed by both global egalitarians and their statist rivals, as it follows from their common commitment to the moral equality of all persons. I illustrate the normative import of the competition criterion by exploring its potential implications for the scope of egalitarian principles of distributive justice. In particular, I highlight the challenges it raises for global egalitarians’ efforts to justify extending the scope of egalitarian justice beyond the state.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abdih, Y., Chami, R., Dagher, J. and Montiel, P.. 2012. Remittances and institutions: are remittances a curse? World Development 40: 657666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abizadeh, A. 2007. Cooperation, pervasive impact, and coercion: on the scope (not site) of distributive justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 35: 318358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D. 2003. Why not a political Coase theorem? Social conflict, commitment, and politics. Journal of Comparative Economics 31: 620652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. A.. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. A.. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York, NY: Crown Business.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. and Robinson, J. A.. 2001. The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. American Economic Review 91: 13691401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Gallego, F. A. and Robinson, J. A.. 2014. Institutions, human capital, and development. Annual Review of Economics 6: 875912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, F. Z. 2012. The perils of unearned foreign income: aid, remittances, and government survival. American Political Science Review 106: 146165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, F. Z. 2013. Remittances deteriorate governance. Review of Economics and Statistics 95: 11661182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Ubaydli, O. 2012. Natural resources and the tradeoff between authoritarianism and development. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 81: 137152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, A. and Dollar, D.. 2000. Who gives foreign aid to whom and why? Journal of Economic Growth 5: 3363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, C. 2014. Global justice between minimalism and egalitarianism. Political Theory 42: 119129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, C. and Valentini, L.. 2009. Egalitarian challenges to global egalitarianism: a critique. Review of International Studies 35: 485512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, R. H. and Lien, D-H. D.. 1985. A note on taxation, development, and representative government. Politics and Society 14: 5370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beitz, C. R. 1999. Political Theory and International Relations. 2nd edn. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Besley, T. and Persson, T.. 2011. Pillars of Prosperity: The Political Economics of Development Clusters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Blake, M. 2001. Distributive justice, state coercion, and autonomy. Philosophy and Public Affairs 30: 257296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, M. 2011. Coercion and egalitarian justice. The Monist 94: 555570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, M. 2013. We are all cosmopolitans now. In Cosmopolitanism Versus Non-Cosmopolitanism: Critiques, Defenses, Reconceptualizations, ed. Brock, G.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boix, C. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, C. and Svolik, M.. 2013. The foundations of limited authoritarian government: institutions, commitment, and power-sharing in dictatorships. Journal of Politics 75: 300316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, G. and Buchanan, J.. 1981. The normative purpose of economic ‘science’: rediscovery of an eighteenth-century method. International Review of Law and Economics 1: 155166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, G. 2009. Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, A. 2004. Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, B. and Smith, A.. 2009. A political economy of aid. International Organization 63: 309340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, B. and Smith, A.. 2010a. Leader survival, revolutions, and the nature of government finance. American Journal of Political Science 54:936950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, B. and Smith, A.. 2010b. The pernicious consequences of UN Security Council membership. Journal of Conflict Resolution 54: 667686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R. M. and Morrow, J. D.. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabrera, L. 2004. Political Theory of Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Case for the World State. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caney, S. 2005. Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caney, S. 2006. Cosmopolitan justice and institutional design: an egalitarian liberal conception of global governance. Social Theory and Practice 32: 725756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caney, S. 2011. Humanity, associations, and global justice: in defence of humanity-centred cosmopolitan egalitarianism. The Monist 94: 506534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, N. and Hardie, J.. 2012. Evidence-Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing It Better. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R. A. 2010. Can international organizations be democratic? A skeptic's view. In The Cosmopolitan Reader, ed. Brown, G. W. and Held, D.. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
de Bres, H. 2011. What's special about the state? Utilitas 23: 140160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietsch, P. and Rixen, T.. 2014. Tax competition and global background justice. Journal of Political Philosophy 22: 150177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterly, W., Ritzen, J. and Woolcock, M.. 2006. Social cohesion, institutions, and growth. Economics and Politics 18: 102120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engerman, S. L. 2008. Debating the role of institutions in political and economic development: theory, history, and findings. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 119135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escribà-Folch, A., Meseguer, C. and Wright, J.. 2015. Remittances and democratization. International Studies Quarterly 59: 571586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Follesdal, A. and Hix, S.. 2006. Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: a response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies 44: 533562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartzke, E. and Naoi, M.. 2011. Multilateralism and democracy: a dissent regarding Keohane, Macedo, and Moravcsik. International Organization 65: 589598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilabert, P. 2012. From Global Poverty to Global Equality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R. E. 1988. What is so special about our fellow countrymen? Ethics 98:663686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, C. 2004. Globalizing Democracy and Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, S. M., MacIntyre, A. and Tiede, L. B.. 2008. The rule of law and economic development. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 205234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, D. 1995. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hix, S. and Høyland, B.. 2011. The Political System of the European Union. 3rd edn. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hix, S. and Høyland, B.. 2013. Empowerment of the European Parliament. Annual Review of Political Science 16: 171189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, M. and Bates, R. H.. 2005. Political institutions and economic policies: lessons from Africa. British Journal of Political Science 35: 403428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, R. 2007. Sovereignty: Evolution of an Idea. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
James, A. 2012. Fairness in Practice: A Social Contract for a Global Economy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. 1996. Toward perpetual peace. In Practical Philosophy, ed. Gregor, M. J., 311352. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Karl, T. L. 1997. The Paradox of Plenty: Oil Booms and Petro-States. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, R. O., Macedo, S. and Moravscik, A.. 2009. Democracy-enhancing multilateralism. International Organization 63: 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, D. D. 2012. Egypt rejects registration bids from 8 U.S. nonprofit groups. The New York Times, 23 April 2012. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/24/world/middleeast/egypt-rejects-registration-bids-from-8-us-nonprofits.html.Google Scholar
Knight, J. and Johnson, J.. 2011. The Priority of Democracy: Political Consequences of Pragmatism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Levi, M. 1988. Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Macdonald, T. 2008. Global Stakeholder Democracy: Power and Representation Beyond Liberal States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. 2007. National Responsibility and Global Justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R. W. 2010. Globalizing Justice: The Ethics of Poverty and Power. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moellendorf, D. 2002. Cosmopolitan Justice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Moellendorf, D. 2005. The World Trade Organization and egalitarian justice. Metaphilosophy 36: 145162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M. 2001. Political underdevelopment: What causes ‘bad governance’? Public Management Review 3: 385418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravscik, A. 2004. Is there a ‘democratic deficit’ in world politics? A framework for analysis. Government and Opposition 39: 336363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, K. M. 2009. Oil, nontax revenue, and the redistributional foundations of regime stability. International Organization 63: 107138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myerson, R. B. 2008. The autocrat's credibility problem and foundations of the constitutional state. American Political Science Review 102: 125139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myerson, R. B. 2011. Toward a theory of leadership and state building. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 108: 2129721301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nili, S. 2013. Who's afraid of a world state? A global sovereign and the statist cosmopolitan debate. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16: 123.Google Scholar
North, D. C. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co. Google Scholar
North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunn, N. 2012. Culture and the historical process. Economic History of Developing Regions 27: S108S126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunn, N. 2014. Historical development. In Handbook of Economic Growth, Vol. 2, ed. Aghion, P. and Darlauf, S., 347402. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Paler, L. 2013. Keeping the public purse: An experiment in windfalls, taxes, and the incentives to restrain government. American Political Science Review 107: 706725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, T. and Tabellini, G.. 2000. Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pevnick, R. 2008. Political coercion and the scope of distributive justice. Political Studies 56: 399413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philpott, D. 2001. Revolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. W. 1992. Cosmopolitanism and sovereignty. Ethics 103: 4875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, T. W. 2008. World Poverty and Human Rights. 2nd edn. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1999. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Risse, M. 2012. On Global Justice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A. and Trebbi, F.. 2004. Institutions rule: the primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth 9: 131165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronzoni, M. 2009. The global order: a case of background injustice? A practice dependent account. Philosophy and Public Affairs 37: 229256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronzoni, M. 2012. Two conceptions of state sovereignty and their implications for global institutional design. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15: 573591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronzoni, M. and Valentini, L.. Forthcoming. Global justice and the role of the state: a critical survey. In Oxford Handbook of Global Justice, ed. Brooks, T.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, M. L. 2001. Does oil hinder democracy? World Politics 53: 325361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, M. L. 2004. Does taxation lead to representation? British Journal of Political Science 34: 229249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangiovanni, A. 2007. Global justice, reciprocity, and the state. Philosophy and Public Affairs 35: 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, D. A. 2012. The Family Channel: Migrant Remittances and Government Finance. MIT Political Science Working Paper No. 2012–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. 2008. The perils of unearned income. Journal of Politics 70:780793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, R. W. 2004. The political economy of IMF lending in Africa. American Political Science Review 98: 577591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svolik, M. 2012. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, C. 1992. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1992. Revised edn. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Programme. 2015. The human development index. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi.Google Scholar
US State Department. 2011. Background note: Sudan. http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/5424.htm.Google Scholar
Valentini, L. 2012. Justice in a Globalized World: A Normative Framework. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wantchekon, L. 2002. Why do resource abundant countries have authoritarian governments? Journal of African Finance and Economic Development 5: 5777.Google Scholar
Weingast, B. R. 1997. The political foundations of democracy and the rule of law. American Political Science Review 91: 245263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenar, L. 2008. Property rights and the resource curse. Philosophy and Public Affairs 36: 232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiens, D. 2013. Demands of justice, feasible alternatives, and the need for causal analysis. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16: 325338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiens, D. 2015. Against ideal guidance. Journal of Politics 77: 433446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ypi, L. 2012. Global Justice and Avant-Garde Political Agency. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zürn, M. 2016. Four models of a global order with cosmopolitan intent: an empirical assessment. Journal of Political Philosophy 24: 88119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar