Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T16:34:04.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Consequentialism, rationality and the relevant description of outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2001

Bruno Verbeek
Affiliation:
Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University

Abstract

Instrumental rationality requires that an agent selects those actions that give her the best outcomes. This is the principle of consequentialism. It may be that it is not the only requirement of this form of rationality. Considerations other than the outcomes may enter the picture as well. However, the outcome(s) of an action always play a role in determining its rationality. Seen in this light consequentialism is a minimum requirement of instrumental rationality. Therefore, any theory that tries to spell out the implications of instrumental rationality, in particular expected utility theory, should subscribe to the principle of consequentialism. Or so it seems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)