No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
COMMENTS ON THE REPORT OF THE INTERNATIONAL PANEL ON SOCIAL PROGRESS, CHAPTERS 9 AND 14: INEQUALITY, DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 October 2018
Extract
Over the past 30 years, the world has experienced a profound transformation, becoming both more open and more prosperous. Whereas in 1985 more than half of the countries worldwide were under authoritarian rule, most countries today are considered electoral democracies (Economist Intelligence Unit 2017). Since 1990, more than a billion people have been lifted out of extreme poverty (World Bank 2016), while well-being indicators have improved dramatically on a global level, especially in terms of health and education (International Idea 2017).
- Type
- Review Symposium on the Report of the International Panel on Social Progress 2018
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018
References
REFERENCES
Cheeseman, N., Luna, J. P., Kitschelt, H., Paget, D., Rosenblatt, F., Sample, K., Toro, S., Valladares Molleda, J., van der Staak, S. and Wang, Y.-T.. 2016. Politics Meet Policies: The Emergence of Programmatic Political Parties. Stockholm: International IDEA.Google Scholar
Galston, W. 2010. Can a Polarized American Party System be ‘Healthy’? Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Hanley, L. 2018. Look at Grenfell Tower and see the terrible price of Britain's inequality. The Guardian, 16 June.Google Scholar
Hickey, S., Sen, K. and Bukenya, B. (eds). 2014. Exploring the politics of inclusive development: towards a new conceptual approach. In The Politics of Inclusive Development: Interrogating the Evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
International IDEA. 2017. The Global State of Democracy: Exploring Democracy's Resilience. Stockholm: International IDEA.Google Scholar
International Panel on Social Progress. 2018. Report of the International Panel on Social Progress: Rethinking Society for the 21st Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keefer, P. 2011. Collective Action, Political Parties and Pro-Development Public Policy. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Paz Arauco, V., Gazdar, H., Hevia-Pacheco, P., Kabeer, N., Lenhardt, A., Quratulain Masood, S., Naqvi, H., Nayak, N., Norton, A., Sadana Sabharwal, N., Scalise, E., Shepherd, A., Thapa, D., Thorat, S. and Hien Tran, D.. 2014. Strengthening Social Justice To Address Intersecting Inequalities Post-2015. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Plattner, M. 2012. Introduction. In Poverty, Inequality, and Democracy, ed. Fukuyama, F., Diamond, L. and Plattner, M.. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Reilly, B. 2013. Southeast Asia: in the shadow of China. Journal of Democracy 24: 156–164.Google Scholar
Rocha Menocal, A. 2017. Mind the Gap: Can Democracy Counter Inequality? In The Global State of Democracy, ed. International IDEA. Stockholm: International IDEA.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2017. The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2016. Tackling Poverty. Poverty and Shared Prosperity Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar