Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T16:01:26.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Audience Effects In Consumption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Metin M.Coşgel
Metin M.Coşgel
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut, Storrs
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Consider how your consumption would change if you were stranded on a deserted island. Isolation would eliminate all social influences on your consumption decisions, even for the same choice set. You might decide not to consume cosmetics, curtains, or neckties, and pay less attention to the style or color of your clothes, car, or furniture. These choices might not matter as much to you anymore, for you would not have to consider the reactions of other individuals to your consumption. Similarly, isolation would also eliminate social influences on your speech. Absent an audience, your choice of words would not be subject to the judgments of others.

Type
Essays
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , April 1994 , pp. 19 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Basu, Kaushik. 1989. “A Theory of Association: Social Status, Prices and Markets.” Oxford Economic Papers 41:653–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borden, Richard J. 1980. “Audience Influence.” In Psychology of Group Influence, edited by Paul, B. Paulus, pp. 99–131. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brennan, Timothy J. 1989. “A Methodological Assessment of Multiple Utility Frame-works.” Economics and Philosophy 5:189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coşgel, Metin M. 1992. “Rhetoric in the Economy: Consumption and Audience.” journal of Socio-Economics 21:363–77.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary and Baron, Isherwood. 1979.The World of Goods. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1981. “What is Equality? Part I: Equality and Welfare.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 10:185–246.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1989. “Social Norms and Economic Theory.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3:99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Robert H. 1985.Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry G. 1971. “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person.” The Journal of Philosophy 68:5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geen, Russell G. 1980. “The Effects of Being Observed on Performance.” In Psychology of Group Influence, edited by Paulus, Paul B, pp. 61–97. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark, and Roland Soong, . 1986. “Threshold Models of Interpersonal Effects in Consumer Demand.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 7:83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, Daniel M. 1992. The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayakawa, Hiroaki, and Yiannis Venieris, . 1977. “Consumer Interdependence via Reference Groups.” Journal of Political Economy 85:599–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Fred. 1977.Social Limits to Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Elizabeth C, and Holbrook, Morris B. 1981. Symbolic Consumer Behavior. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
Iannaccone, Laurence R. 1989. “Bandwagons, and the Threat of Chaos.” Journalof Economic Behavior and Organization 11:431–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kami, Edi,andDavid, Schmeidler. 1990. “Fixed Preferences and Changing Tastes.” The American Economic Review 80:262–67.Google Scholar
Klamer, Arjo. 1990. “Towards the Native's Point of View: The Difficulty of Changing the Conversation.” In Economics and Hermeneutics, edited by Don, Lavoie, pp. 19–33. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Klamer, ArjMcCloskey, Donald N,and Robert Solow (editors).1988. The Consequences of Economic Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuran, Timur. 1990. “Private and Public Preferences.” Economics and Philosophy 6:1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibenstein, Harvey. 1950. “Bandwagon, Snob, And Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers' Demand.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 64:183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, Howard. 1982. Selfishness, Altruism, and Rationality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Donald N. 1985. The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Donald N. 1990. if You're So Smart: The Narrative of Economic Expertise. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McPherson, Michael S. 1983. “Want Formation, Morality, and Some ‘Interpretive’ Aspects of Economic Inquiry.” In Social Science as Moral Inquiry, edited by Norma, Haan, Bellah, Robert N., Paul, Rabinow, and Sullivan, William M., pp. 96–124. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, Michael S. 1984. “On Schelling, Hirschman, and Sen: Revising the Conception of the Self.” Partisan Review 51:236–47.Google Scholar
Pollak, Robert A. 1976. “Interdependent Preferences.” The American Economic Review 66:309–20.Google Scholar
Postema, Gerald J. 1987. “Collective Evils, Harms, and the Law.” Ethics 97:414–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1970. “The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal.” journal of Political Economy 78:152–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1973. “Behavior and the Concept of Preference.” Economica 40:241–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1977. “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 6:317–44.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1982. Models of Bounded Rationality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Spence, Michael A. 1974. Market Signalling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Screening Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Uhlaner, Carole J. 1989. “Relational Goods and Participation: Incorporating Sociability into a Theory of Rational Action.” Public Choice 62:253–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar