Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:27:33.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Epistemic Theory of Democracy Robert E. Goodin and Kai Spiekermann, Oxford University Press, 2018, xvi + 456 pages.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2019

Liam Kofi Bright Open the ORCID record for Liam Kofi Bright [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , November 2019 , pp. 563 - 568
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brennan, J. 2017. Against Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartledge, P. 2016. Democracy: A Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dietrich, F. and List, C.. 2004. A model of jury decisions where all jurors have the same evidence. Synthese 142, 175–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, W.E.B. 1920 [1999]. Of the Ruling of Men. In Darkwater: Voices from Within the Veil. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Edelman, P.H. 2002. On legal interpretations of the Condorcet Jury Theorem. Journal of Legal Studies 31, 327–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrero, A. 2014. Against Elections: The Lottocratic Alternative. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 42, 135–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heesen, R. Bright, L.K. and Zucker, A. 2016. Vindicating methodological triangulation. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1294-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, C.L.R. 1956. Every cook can govern: a study of democracy in Ancient Greece. Correspondence 2 (12). Detroit: Correspondence Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Landemore, H. 2012a. Why the many are smarter than the few and why it matters. Journal of Public Deliberation 8, 1–12.Google Scholar
Landemore, H. 2012b. Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Luxemburg, R. 1918 [1999]. The Russian Revolution. Translated by Bertram Wolfe. Available online at marxists.org.Google Scholar
Munger, M.C. 2008. Blogging and political information: truth or truthiness? Public Choice 134, 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Urken, A.B. 1991. The Condorcet-Jefferson connection and the origins of social choice theory. Public Choice 72, 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenner, D.M. 2017. The need for non-ideal theory: a case study in deliberative democracy. In Political Utopias: Contemporary Debates, ed. Weber, M. and Vallier, K., 203–231. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar