Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:18:58.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ALTRUISM AS A THICK CONCEPT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2010

Michael Schefczyk  and
Mark Peacock
Michael Schefczyk
Affiliation:
Zurich University
Mark Peacock
Affiliation:
York University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we examine different forms of altruism. We commence by analysing the ‘behavioural’ definition and, after clarifying its conditions for altruism, we argue that it is not in ‘reflective equilibrium’ with everyday linguistic usage of the term. We therefore consider a ‘psychological’ definition, which we likewise refine, and argue that it better reflects ordinary language use. Both behavioural and psychological approaches define altruism descriptively and thus fail to capture an important aspect of altruism, namely its normative component. Altruism, we argue, is a ‘thick concept’, i.e. one which embodies both positive and normative components. We discuss and compare various formulations of this normative component.

Type
Essay
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , July 2010 , pp. 165 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allison, H. E. 1996/1993. Idealism and Freedom: Essays on Kant's Theoretical and Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreoni, J. 1995. Cooperation in public-goods experiments: Kindness or confusion? American Economic Review 85: 891–904.Google Scholar
Batson, D. 1991. The Altruism Question: Toward a Social Psychological Answer. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Batson, D. and Shaw, L. 1991. Evidence for altruism: Towards a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychological Inquiry 2: 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunero, J. 2002. Evolution, altruism and ‘internal reward’ explanations. Philosophical Forum 31: 413–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. 1983/1726. Five Sermons. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Quervain, D., Fischbacher, U., Treyer, V., Schellhammer, M., Schnyder, U., Buck, A., and Fehr, E. 2004. The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science 305: 1254–1258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehr, E. and Gächter, S. 2002. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415: 137–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehr, E. and Fischbacher, U. 2003. The nature of human altruism. Nature 425: 785–791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hampton, J. 1993. Selflessness and the loss of self. Social Philosophy & Policy 10: 135–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, T. 1992/1971. Dignity and Practical Reason. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, R. 1985. Obligation, supererogation and self-sacrifice. Philosophy 62: 96–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchgässner, G. 1992. Towards a theory of low-cost decisions. European Journal of Political Economy 8: 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewes, G. 1875/1853. Comte's Philosophy of the Sciences. London: G. Bell and Sons.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1965/1871. Principles of Political Economy with some of their Applications to Social Philosophy. In Collected Works, Vol. II, ed. Robson, J. M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1969/1865. Auguste Comte and Positivism. In Collected Works, Vol. X, ed. Robson, J. M., 261–368. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1969/1861. Utilitarianism. In Collected Works, Vol. X, ed. Robson, J. M., 203–259. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1981/1873. Autobiography. In Collected Works, Vol. I, ed. Robson, J. M., 1–290. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Monroe, K., Barton, M. and Klingelmann, U.. 1990. Altruism and the theory of rational action: Rescuers of Jews in Nazi Europe. Ethics 101: 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacock, M., Schefczyk, M. and Schaber, P. 2005. Altruism and the indispensability of motives. Analyse and Kritik 27: 188–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. 2002. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971/1999. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. 1975. Permissions and supererogation. American Philosophical Quarterly 12: 161–168.Google Scholar
Sesardic, N. 1995. Recent work on human altruism and evolution. Ethics 106: 128–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shine, R., Sun, L-X., Fitzgerald, M. and Kearney, M. 2002. Accidental altruism in insular pit-vipers (Gloydius shedaoensis, Viperidae). Evolutionary Ecology 16: 541–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. and Wilson, D. S. 1998. Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sober, E. and Wilson, D. S. 2000. Summary of: ‘Unto others: the evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior’. Journal of Consciousness Studies 7: 185–206.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. 1971. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 45: 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urmson, J. O. 1958. Saints and heroes. In Essays in Moral Philosophy, ed. Melden, A. I., 198–216. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Williams, B. 1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. 1975 (2000). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. 2002. The accidental altruist. Biology and Philosophy 17: 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar