Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:31:29.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

WEIGHING LIVES – AN APPLIED ECONOMIST'S PERSPECTIVE*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2007

MICHAEL W. JONES-LEE
MICHAEL W. JONES-LEE*
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle Upon Tyne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Without doubt, Weighing Lives, like its precursor, Weighing Goods, is an excellent and thought-provoking piece of work. In the first place, it addresses a question of the most fundamental importance, namely: how should we aggregate the well-being of past, present and future members of the human race under the various possible states of the world that may, in the event, prevail? This involves, amongst other things, dealing with questions of aggregation across time, people and different states of the world; the issue of what constitutes a “neutral” state of well-being (i.e., one neither better nor worse than not being alive) and what is, in fact, the value of continuing to survive.

Type
Essay
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , November 2007 , pp. 373 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aigner, M. and Ziegler, G. M.. 2004. Proofs From the Book. New York, Springer.Google Scholar
Beattie, J., Covey, J., Dolan, P., Hopkins, L., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., Pidgeon, N., Robinson, A., and Spencer, A.. 1998. On the contingent valuation of safety and the safety of contingent valuation: Part 1 – Caveat Investigator. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 17: 5–25.Google Scholar
Blackorby, C. 1990. Economic policy in a second-best environment. Canadian Journal of Economics XX111:748–71.Google Scholar
Broome, J. 1999. Ethics out of Economics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, S., Covey, J., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., and Metcalf, H.. 2004. Valuation of Health Benefits Associated with Reductions in Air Pollution. London, Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.Google Scholar
Carthy, T., Chilton, S., Covey, J., Hopkins, L., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., Pidgeon, N., and Spencer, A.. 1999. On the contingent valuation of safety and the safety of contingent valuation: Part 2 – The CV/SG ‘Chained’ Approach. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 17:187–213.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J. 1955. Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Journal of Political Economy 63:309–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones-Lee, M. W. 1974. The Value of Life: An Economic Analysis. London, Martin Robertson and Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jones-Lee, M. W. 1989. The Economics of Safety and Physical Risk. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jones-Lee, M. W. 2004. Valuing international safety externalities: does the ‘golden rule’ apply? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 29:277–87.Google Scholar