Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T13:11:31.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stable Cooperation in Iterated Prisoners' Dilemmas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Elliott Sober
Elliott Sober
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When does self-interest counsel cooperation? This question pertains both to the labile behaviors produced by rational deliberation and to the more instinctive and fixed behaviors produced by natural selection. In both cases, a standard starting point for the investigation is the one-shot prisoners' dilemma. In this game, each player has the option of producing one or the other of two behaviors (labeled “cooperate” and “defect”). The pay-offs to the row player are as follows:

Type
Essays
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , April 1992 , pp. 127 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Axelrod, R. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Boyd, R., and Lorberbaum, J., 1987. “No Pure Strategy is Evolutionarily Stable in the Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma Game.” Nature 327:58–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, J., and Davies, N.. 1981. An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Luce, R., and Raiffa, H.. 1957. Games and Decisions. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Maynard, Smith J. 1982. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, G., and Smith, J. Maynard. 1990. “Optimality Theory in Evolutionary Biology.” Nature 348:27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. 1940. “On the Notion of Cause.” Mysticism and Logic. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar