Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T09:17:20.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RESCUING JUSTICE AND EQUALITY FROM LIBERTARIANISM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2013

Serena Olsaretti
Serena Olsaretti*
Affiliation:
ICREA–Universitat Pompeu Fabra, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the central motifs of G. A. Cohen's work was his opposition to capitalism in the name of justice. This motif was fully in view in Cohen's work on Robert Nozick's libertarianism: Cohen carefully reconstructed and relentlessly criticized Nozick's apologetics of the free market, which, he thought, was internally coherent but unconvincing. This article suggests that Cohen's opposition to libertarianism did not, however, go far enough, and identifies two respects in which Cohen's position could and should have been more critical of that philosophy.

The first concerns Cohen's negative agenda, that is, his critique of Nozick's libertarianism, the second Cohen's more positive agenda, the formulation of his egalitarian view. With regard to the first, this article argues that Cohen did not subject to full critical pressure the idea of self-ownership libertarians endorse, and consequently accorded it greater inequality-engendering power than libertarians may claim for it. With regard to the second point, this article suggests that Cohen implicitly assumed a market-friendly answer to the question of what consequences people who make choices should be held responsible for, which he could and should have questioned.

Type
Articles
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 43 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arneson, R. J. 1991. Lockean self-ownership: towards a demolition. Political Studies: 36–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, B. 1989. Theories of Justice. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 1988. History, Labour, and Freedom. Themes from Marx. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 1989. On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics 99: 906–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 1995. Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 2000. If You're An Egalitarian, How Come You're So Rich? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 2004. Expensive tastes ride again. In Ronald Dworkin and His Critics, ed. Burley, J.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 2008. Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 2009. Why Not Socialism? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 2000. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 2004. Ronald Dworkin replies. In Ronald Dworkin and His Critics, ed. Burley, J.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fleurbaey, M. 1995. Equal opportunity and equal social outcome? Economics and Philosophy 11: 25–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleurbaey, M. 2008. Fairness, Responsibility and Welfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohfeld, W. 1919. Fundamental Legal Conceptions, ed. Cook, W.W.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, L. 2007. Review of Liberty, Desert and the Market. Economics and Philosophy 23: 125–138.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Olsaretti, S. 2004. Liberty, Desert and the Market. A Philosophical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olsaretti, S. 2009. Responsibility and the consequences of choice. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Vol. CIX, Part 2: 165–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otsuka, M. 2003. Libertarianism Without Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steiner, H. 1994. An Essay on Rights. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vallentyne, P. 1997. Self-ownership and equality: brute luck, gifts, universal dominance, and leximin. Ethics 107: 321–344.Google Scholar
Vallentyne, P. 2000. Left-libertarianism: a primer. In Left Libertarianism and Its Critics: The Contemporary Debate, ed. Vallentyne, P. and Steiner, H.. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Vallentyne, P. 2002. Brute luck, option luck, and equality of initial opportunities. Ethics 112: 529–557.Google Scholar
Vrousalis, N. 2012. Jazz bands, camping trips and decommodification: G.A. Cohen on community. Socialist Studies 8: 1–20.Google Scholar
Williams, A. 2006. Liberty, equality and property. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory, ed. Dryzek, J. S., Honig, B. and Phillips, A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar