Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:03:39.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morality Within the Limits of Reason., Russell Hardin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988, xx + 219 pages.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Ken Binmore
Ken Binmore
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , April 1991 , pp. 112 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Binmore, K. G. 1989. “Social Contract I: Harsanyi and Rawls.” Economic Journal. 99:84–102.Google Scholar
Binmore, K. G. 1988. Social Contract III: Evolution and Utilitarianism. Technical Report CREST 89–05, University of Michigan. Forthcoming in Constitutional Political Economy.Google Scholar
Binmore, K. G. and Samuelson, L.. 1990. Evolution of Finite Automata in Repeated Games. Technical Report, University of Michigan. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Hammond, P. 1976. “Why Ethical Measures of Inequality Need Interpersonal Comparisons.” Theory and Decision. 7:263–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1984. “Rights, utility and universalization.” In Utility and Rights., edited by Frey, R. G., pp. 106–20. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J. 1955. “Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and the Interpersonal Comparison of Utility.” Journal of Political Economy. 63:309–21.Google Scholar