Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:07:00.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lakatosian Perspectives on General Equilibrium Analysis: A REPLY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2009

Andrea Salanti
Andrea Salanti
Affiliation:
Universitá degli Studi di Bergamo, Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comments
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , October 1993 , pp. 283 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Backhouse, Roger. 1991a. “The Neo-Walrasian Research Programme in Macroeconomics.” In Appraising Economic Theories: Studies in the Methodology of Research Programmes, edited by Neil de, Marchi and Mark, Blaug, pp. 403–26. Aldershot: Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, Roger. 1991b. “Lakatos and Economics.” The University of Birmingham, Department of Economics Discussion Paper, N. 91–04 (forthcoming in Perspectives in the History of Economic Thought, Volume 8, edited by Lowry, S. Todd. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1992).Google Scholar
Backhouse, Roger. 1993. “Lakatosian Perspectives on General Equilibrium Analysis.” Economics and Philosophy 9:271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, Bruce. 1986. “Towards a Broader Conception of Criticism.” History of Political Economy 18:675–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, Bruce. 1988. “The Case for Pluralism.” In The Popperian Legacy in Economics, edited by Neil de, Marchi, pp. 231–45. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Robert M. 1986. The Logic of Economic Discovery. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.Google Scholar
Green, Edward J. 1981. “On the Role of Fundamental Theory in Positive Economics.” In Philosophy in Economics, edited by Pitt, Joseph C., pp. 5–15. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
de Marchi, Neil, and Mark, Blaug (editors). 1991. Appraising Economic Theories. Studies in the Methodology of Research Programs. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Remeny, Joseph V. 1979. “Core Demi-Core Interaction: Toward a General Theory of Disciplinary and Subdisciplinary Growth.” History of Political Economy 11:30–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salanti, Andrea. 1989. “Distinguishing ‘Internal’ from ‘External’ Criticism in Economic Methodology.” History of Political Economy 21:635–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salanti, Andrea. 1991. “Roy Weintraub's Studies in Appraisal. Lakatosian Consolations or Something Else?” Economics and Philosophy 7:221–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salanti, Andrea. 1992. “Review: Neil de, Marchi and Mark, Blaug (editors). 1991. Appraising Economic Theories. Studies in the Methodology of Research Programs.” Economic journal 102:1534–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 1985. General Equilibrium Analysis. Studies in Appraisal. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar