Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T20:00:34.860Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Inefficiency of Some Efficiency Comparisons: A Reply to Nye

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Edward Saraydar
Affiliation:
The University of Western Ontario

Extract

John Nye (1990) feels that one of my two brief specific references to his (1987) work “leaves the impression that my work downplays the problems of individual differences in taste or social institutions by dismissing them out of hand” (Nye, 1990, p. 148). Let me assure him that he is unduly alarmed, since virtually all readers will read into the passage that he quotes only what I intended and, indeed, what Nye himself intended - that if he or anyone else had found evidence that firm size mattered for productivity, this would be taken as evidence of inefficiency. This is especially clear because in the previous paragraph I (selectively, I suppose) took note of Nye's own review of the extensive literature that argues that “less productive and, therefore, ‘inefficient’ family firms led to French ‘backwardness’ in production” (Saraydar, 1989, p. 55).

Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Conrad, Alfred H., and Meyer, John R. 1958. “The Economics of Slavery in the Ante Bellum South.” Journal of Political Economy 66:95130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogel, Robert W., and Engerman, Stanley L. 1974. Time on the Cross, vol 1. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Nye, John V. 1987. “Firm Size and Economic Backwardness: A New Look at the French Industrialization Debate.” Journal of Economic History 47:649–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, John V. 1990. “The Conflation of Productivity and Efficiency in Economics and Economic History: A Comment.” Economics and Philosophy 6:147–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saraydar, Edward. 1964. “A Note on the Profitability of Ante Bellum Slavery.” Southern Economic Journal 30:325–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saraydar, Edward. 1989. “The Conflation of Productivity and Efficiency in Economics and Economic History.” Economics and Philosophy 5:5567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasuba, Yasukichi. 1961. “The Profitability and Viability of Plantation Slavery in the United States.” Economic Studies Quarterly 12:6067.Google Scholar