Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T05:52:56.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How to Combine Rhetoric and Realism in the Methodology of Economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Uskali Mäki
Uskali Mäki
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , April 1988 , pp. 89 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boland, Lawrence. 1982. Foundations of Economic Method. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1953. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Klamer, Arjo. 1983. Conversations with Economists. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman.Google Scholar
Klamer, Arjo. 1985. “Economics as Discourse.” In The Popperian Legacy in Economics, edited by de Marchi, Neil and Driehuis, Wim. Cambridge University Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Klamer, Arjo. 1986. “The Self-Portrait of a Discipline: Economics through Its Textbooks.” Mimeo. Wellesley College.Google Scholar
Klamer, Arjo. 1987. “As if Economists and Their Subjects Were Rational …” In The Rhetoric of Human Sciences, edited by Nelson, John et al. The University of Wisconsin Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Donald. 1983. “The Rhetoric of Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 21:481–517.Google Scholar
Klamer, Arjo. 1985. The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Klamer, Arjo. 1986. “Thick and Thin Methodologies in the History of Economic Thought.” In The Popperian Legacy in Economics, edited by de Marchi, Neil and Driehuis, Wim. Cambridge University Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip. 1987. “Shall I Compare Thee to a Minkowski-Ricardo-Leontief-Metzler Matrix of the Mosak-Hicks Type? Or, Rhetoric, Mathematics, and the Nature of Neoclassical Economic Theory.” Economics and Philosophy 3:67–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mäki, Uskali. 1986. “Rhetoric at the Expense of Coherence: A Reinterpretation of Milton Friedman's Methodology.” In Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, Vol. 4, edited by Samuels, Warren. Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar