Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T14:24:09.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond Self-Interest and Altruism: A Reconstruction of Adam Smith's Theory of Human Conduct

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Elias L. Khalil
Elias L. Khalil
Affiliation:
Ohio State University, Mansfield
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I attempt a reconstruction of Adam Smith's view of human nature as explicated in The Theory of Moral Sentiments (TMS). Smith's view of human conduct is neither functionalist nor reductionist, but interactionist. The moral autonomy of the individual, conscience, is neither made a function of public approval nor reduced to self-contained impulses of altruism and egoism. Smith does not see human conduct as a blend of independently defined impulses. Rather, conduct is unified, by the underpinning sentiment of sympathy.

Type
Essays
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , October 1990 , pp. 255 - 273
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anspach, Ralph. 1972. “The Implications of the Theory of Moral Sentiments for Adam Smith's Economic Thought.” History of Political Economy 4:177–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary S. 1976. “Altruism, Egoism, and Genetic Fitness: Economics and Sociobiology.” Journal of Economic Literature 14:817–26.Google Scholar
Berke, Joseph H. 1988. The Tyranny of Malice: Exploring the Dark Side of Character and Culture. New York: Summit Books.Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert. 1962. “Society as Symbolic Interaction.” In Human Behavior and Social Processes, edited by Rose, Arnold M., pp. 179–92. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Brennan, Geoffrey, and Loren, Lomasky. 1985. “The Impartial Spectator Goes to Washington.” Economics and Philosophy 1:189–211.Google Scholar
Brissenden, R. F. 1969. “Authority, Guilt, and Anxiety in The Theory of Moral Sentiments.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 2:946–62.Google Scholar
Buckle, Henry Thomas. 1857–1861. The History of Civilization in England. 2 volumes. London: G. W. Parker.Google Scholar
Campbell, T. D. 1971. Adam Smith's Science of Morals. Totowa, NJ: Rowan and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Campbell, T. D. 1975. “Scientific Explanation and Ethical Justification in Moral Sentiments.” In Essays on Adam Smith, edited by Skinner, Andrew and Wilson, T., pp. 68–82. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cooley, Charles Horton. 1964 (1902). Human Nature and the Social Order. New York: Shocken Books.Google Scholar
Cooley, Charles Horton. 1962 (1902). Social Organization. New York: Shocken Books.Google Scholar
Jon, Elster (editor). 1986. The Multiple Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai. 1986. ‘The Case for a Multiple-Utility Conception.” Economics and Philosophy 2:159–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Robert H. 1988. Passions within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Heilbroner, Robert L. 1982. “The Socialization of the Individual in Adam Smith.” History of Political Economy 14:427–39.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1985. “Against Parsimony: Three Easy Ways of Complicating Some Categories of Economic Discourse.” Economics and Philosophy 1:7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horney, K. 1970. Neurosis and Human Growth. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Karier, Clarence J. 1984. “In Search of Self in a Moral Universe: Notes on George Herbert Mead's Functionalist Theory of Morality.” Journal of the History of Ideas 45:153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 1989. “Adam Smith and Albert Einstein: The Aesthetic Principle of Truth.” History of Economics Society Bulletin 11:222–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 1990. “Natural Complex vs. Natural System.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 13:11–31. Reprinted in General Systems Yearbook 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. n.d. (a). “Adam Smith's Concept of Labor-Commanded: A Study in Misinterpretation.” Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. n.d. (b). “Admiration vs. Respect: A Reformulation of Adam Smith's Theory of Social Rank and Satisfaction.” Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. n.d. (c). “Beyond Individualism and Communalism: A Reinterpretation of Adam Smith's Concept of the Invisible Hand.” Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Kropotkin, Peter. 1902. Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution. New York: McClure Phillips.Google Scholar
Kropotkin, Peter. 1947. Ethics: Origin and Development. New York: Tudor.Google Scholar
Lindgren, Ralph J. 1973. The Social Philosophy of Adam Smith. Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macfie, A. L. 1967. The Individual in Society: Papers on Adam Smith. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1963. Theories of Surplus Value, Part 1. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
McDougall, William. 1963 (1908). An introduction to Social Psychology. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Mead, Geroge H. 1934. Mind, Self and Society, edited by Morris, Charles W.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mead, Geroge H. 1959. The Philosophy of the Present. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Mead, Geroge H. 1982. The Individual and the Social Self, edited by Miller, David L.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Morrow, Glenn R. 1923. “The Significance of the Doctrine of Sympathy in Hume and Adam Smith.” Philosophical Review 32:66–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, Glenn R. 1928. “Adam Smith: Moralist and Philosopher.” In Adam Smith, 1776–1926, by Clark, J. M., pp. 156–79. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Morrow, Glenn R. 1973 (1923). The Ethical and Economic Theories of Adam Smith. New York: Kelly.Google Scholar
Oncken, August. 1897. “The Consistency of Adam Smith.” Economic Journal 7:443–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raphael, D. D. 1975. “The Impartial Spectator.” In Essays on Adam Smith, edited by Skinner, Andrew and Wilson, T., pp. 83–99. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Raphael, D. D. 1985. Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheler, Max. 1954 (1913). The Nature of Sympathy, trans, by Heath, Peter. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Shibutani, Tamotsu. 1961. Society and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Skinner, Andrew S. 1971. “Introduction.” In Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.Google Scholar
Skinner, Andrew S. 1979. A System of Social Science: Papers Relating to Adam Smith. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Andrew, and Wilson, T. (editors). 1975. Essays on Adam Smith. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1976a. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. 2 volumes. Campbell, R. H. and Skinner, A. S., general editors; Todd, W. B., textual editor. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1976b. The Theory of Moral Sentiments, edited by Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1980. Essays on Philosophical Subjects, Raphael, D. D. and Skinner, A. S., general editors; edited by Wightman, W. P. D., Bryce, J. C., and Ross, I. S.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Viner, Jacob. 1928. “Adam Smith and Laissez Faire.” In Adam Smith, 1776–1926, edited by Clark, J. M., pp. 116–55. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Waszek, Norbert. 1984. “Two Concepts of Morality: A Distinction of Adam Smith's Ethics and its Stoic Origin.” Journal of the History of Ideas 45:591–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Jeffrey T. 1986. “The Impartial Spectator and Natural Jurisprudence: An Interpretation of Adam Smith's Theory of the Natural Price.” History of Political Economy 18:365–82.Google Scholar