Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:32:56.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

TESTING THE ORDER OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRATION OF A TIME SERIES IN THE POSSIBLE PRESENCE OF A TREND BREAK AT AN UNKNOWN POINT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2018

Fabrizio Iacone
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Milano,University of York
Stephen J. Leybourne
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
A.M. Robert Taylor*
Affiliation:
University of Essex
*
*Address correspondence to Robert Taylor, Essex Business School, University of Essex, Colchester, CO4 3SQ, UK; e-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

We develop a test, based on the Lagrange multiplier [LM] testing principle, for the value of the long memory parameter of a univariate time series that is composed of a fractionally integrated shock around a potentially broken deterministic trend. Our proposed test is constructed from data which are de-trended allowing for a trend break whose (unknown) location is estimated by a standard residual sum of squares estimator applied either to the levels or first differences of the data, depending on the value specified for the long memory parameter under the null hypothesis. We demonstrate that the resulting LM-type statistic has a standard limiting null chi-squared distribution with one degree of freedom, and attains the same asymptotic local power function as an infeasible LM test based on the true shocks. Our proposed test therefore attains the same asymptotic local optimality properties as an oracle LM test in both the trend break and no trend break environments. Moreover, this asymptotic local power function does not alter between the break and no break cases and so there is no loss in asymptotic local power from allowing for a trend break at an unknown point in the sample, even in the case where no break is present. We also report the results from a Monte Carlo study into the finite-sample behaviour of our proposed test.

Type
ARTICLES
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We are grateful to the Editor, Peter Phillips, three anonymous referees and the Co-Editor, Anna Mikusheva, for their very helpful and constructive comments. Taylor gratefully acknowledges financial support provided by the Economic and Social Research Council of the United Kingdom under research grant ES/M01147X/1.

References

REFERENCES

Angeloni, I., Aucremanne, L., Ehrmann, M., Gali, J., Levin, A., & Smets, F. (2006) New evidence on inflation persistence and price stickiness in the Euro area: Implications for macro modeling. Journal of the European Economic Association 4, 562574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baillie, R.T., Chung, C.-F., & Tieslau, M.A. (1996) Analysing inflation by the fractionally integrated ARFIMA–GARCH model. Journal of Applied Econometrics 11, 2340.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boivin, J. & Giannoni, M.P. (2006) Has monetary policy become more effective? Review of Economics and Statistics 88, 445462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busetti, F. & Harvey, A.C. (2001) Testing for the presence of a random walk in series with structural breaks. Journal of Time Series Analysis 22, 127150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busetti, F. & Harvey, A.C. (2003) Further comments on stationarity tests in series with structural breaks at unknown points. Journal of Time Series Analysis 24, 137140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, S.Y. & Perron, P. (2016) Inference on a structural break in trend with fractionally integrated errors. Journal of Time Series Analysis 37, 555574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarida, R., Gali, J., & Gertler, M. (2000) Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: Evidence and some theory. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115, 147180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickey, D.A. & Fuller, W.A. (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74, 427431.Google Scholar
Diebold, F.X. & Inoue, A. (2001) Long memory and structural change. Journal of Econometrics 105, 131159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrer, J.C. (2011) Inflation persistence. Handbook of Monetary Economics 3, 423486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourieroux, C. & Jasiak, J. (2001) Memory and infrequent breaks. Economics Letters 70, 2941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granger, C.W.J. & Hyung, N. (2004) Occasional structural breaks and long memory with an application to the S&P 500 absolute stock returns. Journal of Empirical Finance 11, 399421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, J.D. (1994) Time Series Analysis. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, A.C. (1993) Time Series Models. Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Hassler, U. & Wolters, J. (1995) Long memory in inflation rates: International evidence. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 13, 3745.Google Scholar
Iacone, F. (2010) Local Whittle estimation of the memory parameter in presence of deterministic components. Journal of Time Series Analysis 31, 3749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iacone, F., Leybourne, S.J., & Taylor, A.M.R. (2013a) On the behavior of fixed-b trend break tests under fractional integration. Econometric Theory 29, 393418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iacone, F., Leybourne, S.J., & Taylor, A.M.R. (2013b) Testing for a break in trend when the order of integration is unknown. Journal of Econometrics 176, 3045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, S. & Nielsen, M.Ø. (2010) Likelihood inference for a nonstationary fractional autoregressive model. Journal of Econometrics 158, 5166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, S. & Nielsen, M.Ø. (2012) A necessary moment condition for the fractional functional central limit theorem. Econometric Theory 28, 671679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P.C.B., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992) Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics 54, 159178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavielle, M. & Moulines, E. (2000) Least squares estimation of an unknown number of shifts in a time series. Journal of Time Series Analysis 21, 3359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinucci, D. & Robinson, P.M. (2000) Weak convergence of multivariate fractional processes. Stochastic Processes and their Applications 86, 103120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, A. & Perron, P. (2013) Memory parameter estimation in the presence of level shifts and deterministic trend. Econometric Theory 29, 11961237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikosch, T. & Starica, K. (2004) Nonlinearity in financial time series, the long range dependence and the I-GARCH effect. Review of Economics and Statistics 86, 378390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, M.Ø. (2004) Efficient likelihood inference in nonstationary univariate models. Econometric Theory 20, 116146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perron, P. (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57, 13611401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perron, P. & Rodríguez, G. (2003) GLS detrending, efficient unit root tests and structural change. Journal of Econometrics 115, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qu, Z. (2011) A test against spurious long memory. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 29, 423438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P.M. (1994) Efficient tests of nonstationary hypotheses. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89, 14201437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, G. (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics 6, 461464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimotsu, K. (2010) Exact local Whittle estimation of fractional integration with unknown mean and time trend. Econometric Theory 26, 501540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimotsu, K. & Phillips, P.C.B. (2005) Exact local Whittle estimation of fractional integration. Annals of Statistics 33, 18901933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, K. (1999) The nonstationary fractional unit root. Econometric Theory 15, 549582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Iacone et al. supplementary material

Iacone et al. supplementary material
Download Iacone et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 398.6 KB