Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T17:33:46.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SEMIPARAMETRIC INDEPENDENCE TESTING FOR TIME SERIES OF COUNTS AND THE ROLE OF THE SUPPORT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 December 2018

David Harris  and
Brendan McCabe
David Harris*
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Brendan McCabe
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
*
*Address correspondence to David Harris, Department of Economics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article considers testing for independence in a time series of small counts within an Integer Autoregressive (INAR) model, taking a semiparametric approach that avoids any distributional assumption on the arrivals process of the model. The nature of the testing problem is shown to differ depending on whether or not the support of the arrivals distribution is the full set of natural numbers (as would be the case for Poisson or Negative Binomial distributions for example) or some strict subset of the natural numbers (such as for a Binomial or Uniform distribution). The theory for these two cases is studied separately.

For the case where the arrivals have support on the natural numbers, a new asymptotically efficient semiparametric test, the effective score (Neyman-Rao) test, is derived. The semiparametric Likelihood-Ratio, Wald and score tests are shown to be asymptotically equivalent to the effective score test, and hence also asymptotically efficient. Asymptotic relative efficiency calculations demonstrate that the semiparametric effective score test can provide substantial power advantages over the first order autocorrelation coefficient, which is most commonly applied in practice.

For the case where the arrivals have support that is a strict subset of the natural numbers, the theory is considerably altered because the support of the observations becomes different under the null and alternative hypotheses. The semiparametric Likelihood-Ratio, Wald and score tests become asymptotically degenerate in this case, while the effective score test remains valid. Remarkably, in this case the effective score test is also found to have power against local alternatives that shrink to the null at the rate T−1. In rare cases where the arrival support is partly or totally known, additional tests exploiting this information are considered.

Finite sample properties of the tests in these various cases demonstrate the semiparametric effective score test can provide substantial power advantages over the first order autocorrelation test implied by a parametric Poisson specification. The simulations also reveal situations in which the first order autocorrelation is preferable in finite samples, so a hybrid of the effective score and autocorrelation tests is proposed to capture most of the benefits of each test.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 35 , Issue 6 , December 2019 , pp. 1111 - 1145
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Al-Osh, M.A. & Alzaid, A.A. (1987) First-order integer valued autoregressive (INAR(1)) process. Journal of Time Series Analysis 8, 261–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billingsley, P. (1995) Probability and Measure, 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Billingsley, P. (1999) Convergence of Probability Measures, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bockenholt, U. (1999) Mixed INAR(1) Poisson regression models: Analyzing heterogeneity and serial dependencies in longitudinal count data. Journal of Econometrics 89, 317–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box, G.E.P. & Pierce, D.A. (1970) Distribution of the residual autocorrelations in ARIMA time series models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91, 1331–1342.Google Scholar
Brännäs, K. & Hellstrom, J. (2001) Generalized integer valued autoregression. Econometric Reviews 20, 425–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardinal, M., Roy, R., & Lambert, J. (1999) On the application of integer-valued time series models for the analysis of disease incidence. Statistics in Medicine 18, 2025–2039.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, S, Hall, W.J., & Schick, A. (1996) Asymptotically uniformly most powerful tests in parametric and semiparametric models. Annals of Statistics 24(2), 841–861.Google Scholar
Drost, F.C., Van den Akker, R., & Werker, B.J.M. (2009) Efficient estimation of autoregression parameters and innovation distributions for semiparametric integer-valued AR(p) models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B) 71, 467–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franke, J. & Seligmann, T. (1993) Conditional maximum-likelihood estimates for INAR(1) processes and their applications to modelling epileptic seizure counts. In Subba Rao, T. (ed.), Developments in Time Series, pp. 310–330. Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeland, R.K. (1998) Statistical Analysis of Discrete Time Series with Applications to the Analysis of Workers Compensation Claims Data. Ph.D. thesis, The University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Gourieroux, C. & Jasiak, J. (2004) Heterogeneous INAR(1) model with application to car insurance. Insurance Mathematics and Economics 34, 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, M., Sun, Y., & White, H. (2016) A flexible nonparametric test for conditional independence. Econometric Theory 32, 1434–1482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, R.C. & Tremayne, A.R. (2003) Testing for serial dependence in time series models of counts. Journal of Time Series Analysis 24(1), 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, L. (1965) Unified treatment of a broad class of discrete probability distributions. In Patil, G.P. (ed.), Classical and Contagious Discrete Distribution, pp. 175–182. Statistical Publishing Society.Google Scholar
McCabe, B.P.M., Martin, G.M., & Harris, D. (2011) Efficient probabilistic forecasts for counts. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 73(2), 253–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, E. (1985) Some simple models for discrete variate time series. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 21(4), 645–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, T.M. & Seneta, E. (1989) Goodness-of-fit for a branching process with immigration using sample partial autocorrelations. Stochastic Processes and their Applications 33(1), 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlopoulos, H. & Karlis, D. (2008) INAR(1) modelling of overdispersed count series with an environmental application. Environmetrics 19, 369–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickands, J. & Stine, R. (1997) Estimation for an M/G/1 queue with incomplete information. Biometrika 84, 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Póo, J.M., Sperlich, S., & Vieu, P. (2015) Specification testing when the null is nonparametric or semiparametric. Econometric Theory 31, 1281–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudholm, N. (2001) Entry and the number of firms in the Swedish pharmaceuticals market. Review of Industrial Organization 19, 351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shao, X. (2011) Testing for white noise under unknown dependence and its applications to diagnostic checking for time series models. Econometric Theory 27, 312–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, J. & McCabe, B.P.M. (2013) Score statistics for testing the serial dependence in count data. Journal of Time Series Analysis 34(3), 315–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thyregod, P., Carstensen, J., Madsen, H., & Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K. (1999) Integer valued autoregressive models for tipping bucket rainfall measurements. Environmetrics 10, 395–411.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkataraman, K.N. (1982) A time series approach to the study of the simple subcritical Galton-Watson process with immigration. Advances in Applied Probability 14(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, C. (2008) Thinning operations for modeling time series of counts: A survey. ASTA Advances in Statistical Analysis 92(3), 319–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whang, Y.J. (1998) A test of autocorrelation in the presence of heteroskedasticity of unknown form. Econometric Theory 14, 87–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Harris and McCabe supplementary material

Harris and McCabe supplementary material
Download Harris and McCabe supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 241.5 KB