Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:24:48.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REGULARIZED ESTIMATION OF DYNAMIC PANEL MODELS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2022

Marine Carrasco  and
Ada Nayihouba
Marine Carrasco*
Affiliation:
University of Montreal
Ada Nayihouba
Affiliation:
World Bank
*
Address correspondence to Marine Carrasco, CIREQ, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In a dynamic panel data model, the number of moment conditions increases rapidly with the time dimension, resulting in a large dimensional covariance matrix of the instruments. As a consequence, the generalized method of moments (GMM) estimator exhibits a large bias in small samples, especially when the autoregressive parameter is close to unity. To address this issue, we propose a regularized version of the one-step GMM estimator using three regularization schemes based on three different ways of inverting the covariance matrix of the instruments. Under double asymptotics, we show that our regularized estimators are consistent and asymptotically normal. These regularization schemes involve a tuning or regularization parameter which needs to be chosen. We derive a data-driven selection of this regularization parameter based on an approximation of the higher-order mean square error and show its optimality. As an empirical application, we estimate a model of income dynamics.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , April 2024 , pp. 360 - 418
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Footnotes

The authors thank the Editor (P.C.B. Phillips), the Co-Editor (Guido Kuersteiner), three anonymous referees, Ryo Okui, and the participants of the NBER-NSF conference (2016), NY Camp Econometrics (2017), Canadian Economic Association (2018), International Association for Applied Econometrics (2018), and the Econometric Study Group (2019) for their helpful comments. Carrasco thanks SSHRC for partial financial support.

References

REFERENCES

Alvarez, J. & Arellano, M. (2003) The time series and cross-section asymptotics of dynamic panel data estimators. Econometrica 71(4), 1121–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arellano, M. & Bond, S. (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies 58, 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arellano, M. & Bover, O. (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics 68(1), 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belloni, A., Chen, D., Chernozhukov, V., & Hansen, C. (2012) Sparse models and methods for optimal instruments with an application to eminent domain. Econometrica 80, 2369–2429.Google Scholar
Blundell, R. & Bond, S. (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 87(1), 115–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blundell, R. & Bond, S. (2000) GMM estimation with persistent panel data: An application to production functions. Econometric Reviews 19, 321–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bun, M.J. & Kiviet, J.F. (2006) The effects of dynamic feedbacks on LS and MM estimator accuracy in panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 132(2), 409–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bun, M.J.G. & Windmeijer, F. (2010) The weak instrument problem of the system GMM estimator in dynamic panel data models. The Econometrics Journal 13(1), 95–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrasco, M. (2012) A regularization approach to the many instruments problem. Journal of Econometrics 170(2), 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrasco, M., Chernov, M., Florens, J.-P., & Ghysels, E. (2007a) Efficient estimation of general dynamic models with a continuum of moment conditions. Journal of Econometrics 140(2), 529–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrasco, M., Florens, J.-P., & Renault, E. (2007b) Chapter 17: Linear inverse problems in structural econometrics estimation based on spectral decomposition and regularization. In Handbook of Econometrics , pp. 5633–5751. Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrasco, M. & Tchuente, G. (2015) Regularized LIML for many instruments. Journal of Econometrics 186(2), 427–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, S.G. & Newey, W.K. (2001) Choosing the number of instruments. Econometrica 69(5), 1161–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doran, H.E. & Schmidt, P. (2006) GMM estimators with improved finite sample properties using principal components of the weighting matrix, with an application to the dynamic panel data model. Journal of Econometrics 133(1), 387–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groetsch, C. (1993) Inverse Problems in the Mathematical Sciences . Theory and Practice of Applied Geophysics Series. Vieweg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, J., & Kuersteiner, G. (2002) Asymptotically unbiased inference for a dynamic panel model with fixed effect when both n and T are large. Econometrica 70(4), 1639–1657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, J., Hausman, J., & Kuersteiner, G. (2004) Estimation with weak instruments: Accuracy of higher-order bias and MSE approximations. The Econometrics Journal 7, 272–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, B.E. (2007) Least squares model averaging. Econometrica 75(4), 1175–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayakawa, K. (2009) A simple efficient instrumental variable estimator for panel AR(p) models when both N and T are large. Econometric Theory 25, 873–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayakawa, K., Qi, M., & Breitung, J. (2019) Double filter instrumental variable estimation of panel data models with weakly exogenous variables. Econometric Reviews 38(9), 1055–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirano, K. (2002) Semiparametric Bayesian inference in autoregressive panel data models. Econometrica 70(2), 781–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsiao, C. & Zhou, Q. (2018) JIVE for panel dynamic simultaneous equations models. Econometric Theory 34(6), 1325–1369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiviet, J.F. (1995) On bias, inconsistency, and efficiency of various estimators in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 68(1), 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kress, R. (1999) Linear Integral Equations . Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuersteiner, G. (2012) Kernel-weighted GMM estimators for linear time series models. Journal of Econometrics 170(2), 399–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuersteiner, G. & Okui, R. (2010) Constructing optimal instruments by first-stage prediction averaging. Econometrica 78, 697–718.Google Scholar
Levine, R., Loayza, N., & Beck, T. (2000) Financial intermediation and growth: Causality and causes. Journal of Monetary Economics 46(1), 31–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, K.-C. (1986) Asymptotic optimality of CL and generalized cross-validation in ridge regression with application to spline smoothing. Annals of Statistics 14(3), 1101 – 1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, K.-C. (1987) Asymptotic optimality for CP, CL, cross-validation and generalized cross-validation: Discrete index set. Annals of Statistics 15(3), 958–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitze, T. (2012) Empirical Modelling in Regional Science . Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagar, A.L. (1959) The bias and moment matrix of the general k-class estimators of the parameters in simultaneous equations. Econometrica 27(4), 575–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okui, R. (2009) The optimal choice of moments in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 151, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okui, R. (2011) Instrumental variable estimation in the presence of many moment conditions. Journal of Econometrics 165(1), 70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar