Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:20:33.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

QML ESTIMATION OF A CLASS OF MULTIVARIATE ASYMMETRIC GARCH MODELS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2011

Christian Francq  and
Jean-Michel Zakoïan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We establish the strong consistency and asymptotic normality of the quasi-maximum likelihood estimator (QMLE) of the parameters of a class of multivariate asymmetric generalized autoregressive conditionally heteroskedastic processes, allowing for cross leverage effects. The conditions required to establish the asymptotic properties of the QMLE are mild and coincide with the minimal ones in the univariate case. In particular, no moment assumption is made on the observed process. Instead, we require strict stationarity, for which a necessary and sufficient condition is established. The asymptotic results are illustrated by Monte Carlo experiments, and an application to a bivariate exchange rates series is proposed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , February 2012 , pp. 179 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors sincerely thank the editor Peter C.B. Phillips, the co-editor Pentti Saikkonen, and two anonymous referees for their very helpful comments and suggestions.

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, D.W.K. (2001) Testing when a parameter is on a boundary of the maintained hypothesis. Econometrica 69, 683–734.Google Scholar
Aue, A., Hörmann, S., Horváth, L., & Reimherr, M. (2009) Break detection in the covariance structure of multivariate time series models. Annals of Statistics 37, 4046–4087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardet, J.-M. & Wintenberger, O. (2009) Asymptotic normality of the quasi-maximum likelihood estimator for multidimensional causal processes. Annals of Statistics 37, 2730–2759.10.1214/08-AOS674Google Scholar
Basrak, B., Davis, R.A., & Mikosch, T. (2002) Regular variation of GARCH processes. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 99, 95–115.Google Scholar
Bauwens, L., Laurent, S. and Rombouts, J.V.K. (2006) Multivariate GARCH models: A survey. Journal of Applied Econometrics 21, 79–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, I., Horváth, L. and Kokoszka, P. (2003) GARCH processes: Structure and estimation. Bernoulli 9, 201–227.10.3150/bj/1068128975Google Scholar
Billingsley, P. (1961) The Lindeberg-Levy theorem for martingales. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 12, 788–792.Google Scholar
Bollerslev, T. (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics 31, 307–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollerslev, T. (1990) Modelling the coherence in short-run nominal exchange rates: A multivariate generalized ARCH model. Review of Economics and Statistics 72, 498–505.Google Scholar
Bougerol, P. and Picard, N. (1992a) Strict stationarity of generalized autoregressive processes. Annals of Probability 20, 1714–1729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bougerol, P. and Picard, N. (1992b) Stationarity of GARCH processes and of some nonnegative time series. Journal of Econometrics 52, 115–127.Google Scholar
Cappiello, L., Engle, R.F., & Sheppard, K. (2006) Asymmetric dynamics in the correlations of global equity and bond returns. Journal of Financial Econometrics 4, 537–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comte, F. & Lieberman, O. (2003) Asymptotic theory for multivariate GARCH processes. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 84, 61–84.Google Scholar
Engle, R.F. (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with estimates of the variance of the United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica 50, 987–1007.Google Scholar
Engle, R.F. (2002) Dynamic conditional correlation: A simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 20, 339–350.Google Scholar
Engle, R.F. (2009) Anticipating Correlations. A New Paradigm for Risk Management. Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400830190Google Scholar
Engle, R.F. and Sheppard, K. (2001) Theoretical and Empirical Properties of Dynamic Conditional Correlation Multivariate GARCH. Discussion paper, University of California San Diego.Google Scholar
Francq, C. and Zakoïan, J.-M. (2004) Maximum likelihood estimation of pure GARCH and ARMA-GARCH processes. Bernoulli 10, 605–637.Google Scholar
Francq, C. and Zakoïan, J.-M. (2007) Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation in GARCH processes when some coefficients are equal to zero. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 117, 1265–1284.Google Scholar
Francq, C. and Zakoïan, J.-M. (2009) Testing the nullity of GARCH coefficients: Correction of the standard tests and relative efficiency comparisons. Journal of the American Statistical Association 104, 313–324.Google Scholar
Francq, C. & Zakoïan, J.-M. (2010) GARCH Models. Structure, Statistical Inference and Financial Applications. Wiley.Google Scholar
Glosten, L.R., Jaganathan, R. and Runkle, D. (1993) On the relation between the expected values and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. Journal of Finance 48, 1779–1801.Google Scholar
Hafner, C. and Preminger, A. (2009) Asymptotic theory for a factor GARCH model. Econometric Theory 25, 336–363.Google Scholar
Hamadeh, T. & Zakoïan, J.-M. (2011) Asymptotic properties of LS and QML estimators for a class of nonlinear GARCH processes. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 141, 488–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannan, E.J. (1969) The identification of vector mixed autoregressive-moving average systems. Biometrika 56, 223–225.Google Scholar
Harville, D. (1997) Matrix Algebra from a Statistician’s Perspective. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
He, C. & Teräsvirta, T. (2004) An extended constant conditional correlation GARCH model and its fourth-moment structure. Econometric Theory 20, 904–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeantheau, T. (1998) Strong consistency of estimators for multivariate ARCH models. Econometric Theory 14, 70–86.Google Scholar
Koutmos, G. and Booth, G.G. (1995) Asymmetric volatility transmission in international stock markets. Journal of International Money and Finance 14, 747–762.Google Scholar
Ling, S. and McAleer, M. (2003) Asymptotic theory for a vector ARMA-GARCH model. Econometric Theory 19, 280–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnus, J.R. and Neudecker, H. (1988) Matrix Differential Calculus with Applications in Statistics and Econometrics. Wiley.Google Scholar
McAleer, M., Chan, F., Hoti, S., & Lieberman, O. (2009) Generalized autoregressive conditional correlation. Econometric Theory 28, 422–440.Google Scholar
McAleer, M., Hoti, S., & Chan, F. (2009) Structure and asymptotic theory for multivariate asymmetric conditional volatility. Econometric Reviews 28, 422–440.Google Scholar
Meitz, M. and Saikkonen, P. (2011) Parameter estimation in nonlinear AR-GARCH models. Econometric Theory 27, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Nakatani, T. and Teräsvirta, T. (2009) Testing for volatility interactions in the constant conditional correlation GARCH model. Econometrics Journal 12, 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D.B. (1991) Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica 59, 347–370.Google Scholar
Pan, J., Wang, H., and Tong, H. (2008) Estimation and tests for power-transformed and threshold GARCH models. Journal of Econometrics 142, 352–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinsel, G.C. (1997) Elements of Multivariate Time Series Analysis. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Silvennoinen, A. & Teräsvirta, T. (2009) Multivariate GARCH models. In Andersen, T.G., Davis, R.A., Kreiss, J.-P., & Mikosch, T. (eds.), Handbook of Financial Time Series, pp. 201–229. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Straumann, D. & Mikosch, T. (2006) Quasi-maximum-likelihood estimation in heteroscedastic time series: A stochastic recurrence equation approach. Annals of Statistics 34, 2449–2495.10.1214/009053606000000803Google Scholar