Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:39:35.357Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ON THE CONDITIONAL LIKELIHOOD RATIO TEST FOR SEVERAL PARAMETERS IN IV REGRESSION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

Grant Hillier
Grant Hillier*
Affiliation:
CeMMAP and University of Southampton
*
*Address correspondence to Grant Hillier, Department of Economics, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom; e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For the problem of testing the hypothesis that all m coefficients of the right-hand-side endogenous variables in an instrumental variables (IV) regression are zero, the likelihood ratio (LR) test can, if the reduced form covariance matrix is known, be rendered similar by a conditioning argument. To exploit this fact requires knowledge of the relevant conditional cumulative distribution function (c.d.f.) of the LR statistic, but the statistic is a function of the smallest characteristic root of an (m + 1)-square matrix and is therefore analytically difficult to deal with when m > 1. We show in this paper that an iterative conditioning argument used by Hillier (2009) and Andrews, Moreira, and Stock (2007 Journal of Econometrics 139, 116–132) to evaluate the c.d.f. in the case m = 1 can be generalized to the case of arbitrary m. This means that we can completely bypass the difficulty of dealing with the smallest characteristic root. Analytic results are obtained for the case m = 2, and a simple and efficient simulation approach to evaluating the c.d.f. is suggested for larger values of m.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 305 - 335
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. (1972) Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover.Google Scholar
Andrews, D.W.K., Moreira, M., & Stock, J. (2006) Optimal two-sided invariant similar tests for instrumental variables regression. Econometrica 74, 715–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, D.W.K., Moreira, M., & Stock, J. (2007) Performance of conditional Wald tests in IV regression with weak instruments. Journal of Econometrics 139, 116–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courant, R. & Hilbert, D.(1953) Methods of Mathematical Physics, vol. 1. Interscience.Google Scholar
Hillier, G.H. (1987) Classes of similar regions and their power properties for some econometric testing problems. Econometric Theory 3, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillier, G.H. (2006) Exact properties of the conditional likelihood ratio test in an IV regression. Econometric Theory 25, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Kleibergen, F. (2007) Generalizing weak instrument robust IV statistics towards multiple parameters, unrestricted covariance matrices and identification statistics. Journal of Econometrics 139, 181–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreira, M. (2003) A conditional likelihood ratio test for structural models. Econometrica 71, 1027–1048.Google Scholar
Muirhead, R.J. (1982) Aspects of Multivariate Statistical Theory. Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staiger, D. & Stock, J.H. (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65, 557–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar