Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:16:06.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IDENTIFICATION OF PAIRED NONSEPARABLE MEASUREMENT ERROR MODELS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2016

Yingyao Hu  and
Yuya Sasaki
Yingyao Hu*
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University
Yuya Sasaki*
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University
*
*Address correspondence to Yingyao Hu and Yuya Sasaki, Department of Economics, Johns Hopkins University, Wyman Park Building 544E, 3400 N. Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21218; e-mail: [email protected], [email protected].
*Address correspondence to Yingyao Hu and Yuya Sasaki, Department of Economics, Johns Hopkins University, Wyman Park Building 544E, 3400 N. Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21218; e-mail: [email protected], [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper studies the paired nonseparable measurement error models, where two measurements, X and Y, are produced by mutually independent unobservables, U, V, and W, through the system, X = g(U,V) and Y = h(U,W). We propose restrictions to identify the marginal distribution of the common component U and the conditional distributions of X and Y given U. Applying this method to twin panel data, we find the following robust reporting patterns for years of education: (1) self reports are accurate only when the true years of education are 16 or 18, typically corresponding to advanced university degrees in the US education system; (2) sibling reports are accurate whenever the true years of education are 12, 14, 16, and 18, which are typical diploma years.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , August 2017 , pp. 955 - 979
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We received helpful comments from the co-editor, Arthur Lewbel, four anonymous referees, and seminar participants at Ohio State University, Greater New York Metropolitan Area Econometrics Colloquium 2012, AMES 2013, and ESEM 2013. We thank Peter C.B. Phillips and Elizabeth Frankfield for their useful editorial input to our paper. The usual disclaimer applies.

References

REFERENCES

Arellano, M. & Bonhomme, S. (2012) Identifying distributional characteristics in random coefficients panel data models. Review of Economic Studies 79, 987–1020.Google Scholar
Ashenfelter, O. & Krueger, A.B. (1994) Estimates of the economic returns to schooling from a new sample of twins. American Economic Review 84, 1157–1173.Google Scholar
Behrman, J.R., Taubman, P., & Wales, T.J. (1977) Controlling for and measuring the effects of genetics and family environment in equations for schooling and labor market success. In Taubman, P. (ed.), Kinometrics: The Determinants of Socioeconomic Success within and between-Families, pp. 35–96. North-Holland.Google Scholar
Behrman, J.R. & Rosenzweig, M.R. (1999) “Ability” biases in schooling returns and twins: a test and new estimates. Economics of Education Review 18, 159–167.Google Scholar
Bonhomme, S., & Robin, J. (2010) Generalized non-parametric deconvolution with an application to earnings dynamics. Review of Economic Studies 77, 491–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, R.J., Chen, X., & Hu, Y. (2010) Identification and inference in nonlinear models using two samples with nonclassical measurement errors. Journal of Nonparametric Statistics 22, 379–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Hong, H., & Tamer, E. (2005) Measurement error models with auxiliary data. Review of Economic Studies 72, 343–366.Google Scholar
Chen, X., Hong, H., & Tarozzi, A. (2008) Semiparametric efficiency in GMM models with auxiliary data. Annals of Statistics 36, 808–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Hu, Y., & Lewbel, A. (2009) Nonparametric identification and estimation of nonclassical errors-in-variables models without additional information. Statistica Sinica 19, 949–968.Google Scholar
Cunha, F., Heckman, J., & Navarro, S. (2005) Separating uncertainty from heterogeneity in life cycle earnings. Oxford Economic Papers 57, 191–261.Google Scholar
D’Haultfoeuille, X. & Février, P. (2010) Identification of mixture models using support variations. Working Paper, CREST.Google Scholar
Evdokimov, K. (2010) Identification and estimation of a nonparametric panel data model with unobserved heterogeneity. Working Paper, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Hansen, K.T., Heckman, J.J., & Mullen, K.J. (2004) The effect of schooling and ability on achievement test scores. Journal of Econometrics 121, 39–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Y. (2008) Identification and estimation of nonlinear models with misclassification error using instrumental variables: a general solution. Journal of Econometrics 144, 27–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Y. & Sasaki, Y. (2015) Closed-form estimation of nonparametric models with non-classical measurement errors. Journal of Econometrics 185, 392–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Y. & Schennach, S.M. (2008) Instrumental variable treatment of nonclassical measurement error models. Econometrica 76, 195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennan, J. & Walker, J.R. (2011) The effect of expected income on individual migration decisions. Econometrica 79, 211–251.Google Scholar
Kim, K., Petrin, A., & Song, S. (2016) Estimating production functions with control functions when capital is measured with error. Journal of Econometrics 190, 267–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasnokutskaya, E. (2011) Identification and estimation of auction models with unobserved heterogeneity. Review of Economic Studies 78, 293–327.Google Scholar
Lewbel, A. (2007) Estimation of average treatment effects with misclassification. Econometrica 75, 537–551.Google Scholar
Li, T. (2002) Robust and consistent estimation of nonlinear errors-in-variables models. Journal of Econometrics 110, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, T., Perrigne, I., & Vuong, Q. (2000) Conditionally independent private information in OCS wildcat auctions. Journal of Econometrics 98, 129–161.Google Scholar
Li, T. & Vuong, Q. (1998) Nonparametric estimation of the measurement error model using multiple indicators. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 65, 139–165.Google Scholar
Mahajan, A. (2006) Identification and estimation of single index models with misclassified regressor. Econometrica 74, 631–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matzkin, R.L. (2003) Nonparametric estimation of nonadditive random functions. Econometrica 71, 1339–1375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P., Mulvey, C., & Martin, N. (1995) What do twins studies reveal about the economic returns to education? A comparison of Australian and U.S. findings. American Economic Review 85, 586–599.Google Scholar
Rouse, C.E. (1999) Further estimates of the economic return to schooling from a new sample of twins. Economics of Education Review 18, 149–157.Google Scholar
Schennach, S. (2004a) Estimation of nonlinear models with measurement error. Econometrica 72, 33–75.Google Scholar
Schennach, S. (2004b) Nonparametric regression in the presence of measurement errors. Econometric Theory 20, 1046–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Paul M. & Robert, W.H. (1968) A causal approach to the study of measurement error. In Blalock, H.M. and Blalock, A.B. (eds.), Methodology in Social Research, pp. 28–59. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Song, S., Schennach, S.M., & White, H. (2012) Estimating nonseparable models with mismeasured endogenous variables. Working Paper, University of Wisconsin Milwaukee.Google Scholar