Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:18:11.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluating Models: A Review of L.G. Godfrey Misspecification Tests in Econometrics Econometric Society Monographs No. 16 Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 252+xii, $49.50

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

A.R. Pagan
A.R. Pagan
Affiliation:
University of Rochester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 1990 , pp. 273 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bahadur, R.R. An optimal property of the likelihood ratio statistic. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium in Mathematical Statistics, 1, 13–26University of California Press, 1965.Google Scholar
2.Brown, B.W.Prediction-based tests for mis-specification in nonlinear dynamic models. Mimeo, Rice University, 1989.Google Scholar
3.Calzolari, G. & Panattoni, L.. Alternative estimators of FIML covariance matrix: A Monte Carlo study. Econometrica 56 (1988): 701–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Chesher, A. & Spady, R.. Asymptotic expansions of the information matrix test statistic. Mimeo, Bristol University, 1988.Google Scholar
5.Dagenais, M.G. & Dufour, J.M.. Invariance, nonlinear models and asymptotic tests. Discussion Paper 3287, CRDE, University of Montreal, 1986.Google Scholar
6.Durbin, J.Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression when some of the regressors are lagged dependent variables. Econometrica 38 (1970): 410–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Engle, R.F., Lillien, D. & Robins, R.P.. Estimating time varying risk premia in the term structure: The arch-M model. Econometrica 55 (1987): 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Greene, W.H.Econometric analysis. New York: MacMillan, 1990.Google Scholar
9.Harris, P.An asymptotic expansion for the null distribution of the efficient score statistic. Biometrika 72 (1985): 653–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Honda, Y.A size correction to the Lagrange multiplier test for heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics 38 (1985): 375–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Jaggia, S. & Trivedi, P.K.. Joint and separate score tests for state dependence and unobserved heterogeneity. Mimeo, Indiana University, 1989.Google Scholar
12.Kennan, J. & Neumann, G.R.. Why does the information matrix test reject too often. Working Paper No. 88–4, University of Iowa, 1988.Google Scholar
13.Luukkonen, R., Saikkonen, P. & Terasvirta, T.. Testing linearity in univariate time series models. Scandanavian Journal of Statistics 15 (1989): 161–175.Google Scholar
14.Maddala, G.S.Introduction to econometrics. New York: Macmillan, 1986.Google Scholar
15.Mariano, R.S. & Brown, B.W.. “Prediction-based tests for mis-specification in nonlinear simultaneous systems.” In Karlin, S., Amemiya, T. & Goodman, L. (eds), Studies in econometrics, time-series, and multivariate statistics. New York: Academic Press, 1983.Google Scholar
16.Nelson, F.D. & Savin, N.E.. On the invariance properties of the Wald, likelihood ratio and Lagrange multiplier tests. Mimeo, University of Iowa, 1988.Google Scholar
17.Newey, W.Maximum likelihood specification testing and conditional moment tests. Econometrica 53 (1985): 1047–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Newey, W.K.Generalized method of moments specification testing. Journal of Econometrics 29 (1985): 229–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Pagan, A.R. & Hall, A.D.. Diagnostic tests as residual analysis. Econometric Reviews 2 (1983): 159–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Pagan, A.R. & Sabau, H.C.L.. Consistency tests for heteroskedastic and risk models. Mimeo, University of Rochester, 1987.Google Scholar
21.Pagan, A.R. & Vella, F.. Diagnostic tests for models based on individual data: A survey. Journal of Applied Econometrics 45 (1989), 429–459.Google Scholar
22.Phillips, P.C.B.Time series regression with a unit root. Econometrica 55 (1987), 277–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Ramanathan, R.Introductory econometrics. San Diego: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1989.Google Scholar
24.Tauchen, G.Diagnostic testing and evaluation of maximum likelihood models. Journal of Econometrics 30 (1985): 415–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.White, H.Maximum likelihood estimation of mis-specified models. Econometrica 50 (1982): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Wooldridge, J.M.A unified approach to robust, regression-based specification tests. Mimeo, M.I.T., 1987.Google Scholar