Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:35:56.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparing Single-Equation Estimators in a Simultaneous Equation System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2010

T. W. Anderson ,
Naoto Kunitomo  and
Kimio Morimune
T. W. Anderson
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Naoto Kunitomo
Affiliation:
University of Tokyo
Kimio Morimune
Affiliation:
Kyoto University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Comparisons of estimators are made on the basis of their mean squared errors and their concentrations of probability computed by means of asymptotic expansions of their distributions when the disturbance variance tends to zero and alternatively when the sample size increases indefinitely. The estimators include k-class estimators (limited information maximum likelihood, two-stage least squares, and ordinary least squares) and linear combinations of them as well as modifications of the limited information maximum likelihood estimator and several Bayes' estimators. Many inequalities between the asymptotic mean squared errors and concentrations of probability are given. Among medianunbiasedestimators, the limited information maximum likelihood estimator dominates the median-unbiased fixed k-class estimator.

Type
Research Article
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , April 1986 , pp. 1 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Akahira, M. and Takeuchi., K. Asymptotic Efficiency of Statistical Estimators: Concepts and Higher Order Asymptotic Efficiency. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.Google Scholar
2. Anderson, T. W. Asymptotic expansions of the distributions of estimates in simultaneous equations for alternative parameter sequence. Econometrica 45 (1977): 506–518.Google Scholar
3. Anderson, T. W. An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1984.Google Scholar
4. Anderson, T. W., Kunitomo, N., and Sawa., T. Evaluation of the distribution of the limited information maximum likelihood estimator. Econometrica 50 (1982): 1009–1027.Google Scholar
5. Anderson, T. W., Morimune, K., and Sawa., T. The numerical values of some key parameters in econometric models. Journal of Econometrics 21 (1983): 229–243.Google Scholar
6. Anderson, T. W. and Rubin., H. Estimation of the parameters of a single equation in a complete system of stochastic equations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 20 (1949): 46–63.Google Scholar
7. Anderson, T. W. and Rubin., H. The asymptotic properties of estimates of the parameters of a single equation in a complete system of stochastic equations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 21 (1950): 570–582.Google Scholar
8. Anderson, T. W. and Sawa., T. Evaluation of the distribution function of the two-stage leastsquares estimate. Econometrica 47 (1979): 163–182.10.2307/1912353Google Scholar
9. Basmann, R. L. A generalized classical method of linear estimation of coefficients in a structural equation. Econometrica 25 (1957): 77–83.Google Scholar
10. Brown, G. F., Kadane, J. B., and Ramage., J. G. The asymptotic bias and mean-squared error of double k-class estimators when the disturbances are small. International Economic Review 15 (1974): 667–679.10.2307/2525733Google Scholar
11. Dreze, J. H. Bayesian limited information analysis of the simultaneous equations model. Econometrica 44 (1976): 1045–1075.Google Scholar
12. Fujikoshi, Y., Morimune, K., Kunitomo, N., and Taniguchi, M.. Asymptotic expansions of the distributions of the estimates of coefficients in a simultaneous equation system. Journal of Econometrics 18 (1982): 191–205.Google Scholar
13. Fuller, W. A. Some properties of a modification of the limited information estimator. Econometrica 45 (1977): 939–953.Google Scholar
14. Kadane, J. B. Comparison of k-class estimators when the disturbances are small. Econometrica 39 (1971): 723–737.Google Scholar
15. Kunitomo, N. Asymptotic expansions of the distributions of estimators in a linear functional relationship and simultaneous equations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 75 (1980): 693–700.Google Scholar
16. Kunitomo, N. Asymptotic efficiency and higher order efficiency of the limited information maximum likelihood estimator in large econometric models, unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, 1981.Google Scholar
17. Kunitomo, N., Morimune, K., and Tsukuda., Y. Asymptotic expansions of the distributions of k-class estimators when the disturbances are small. The Economic Studies Quarterly 32 (1981): 156–163.Google Scholar
18. Maddala, G. S. Statistical inference in relation to the size of the model. In Kmenta, J. and Ramsey, J. B. (eds.), Large-Scale Econometric Models, pp. 191–218. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1982.Google Scholar
19. Mariano, R. S. and Sawa., T. The exact finite-sample distribution of the limited information maximum likelihood estimator in the case of two included endogenous variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 67 (1972): 159–163.10.1080/01621459.1972.10481219Google Scholar
20. Morimune, K. Improving the limited information maximum likelihood estimator when the disturbances are small. Journal of the American Statistical Association 73 (1978): 867–871.Google Scholar
21. Morimune, K. Approximate distributions of the k-class estimator when the degree of overidentifiability is large compared with the sample size. Econometrica 51 (1983): 821–841.Google Scholar
22. Morimune, K. and Kunitomo., N. Improving the maximum likelihood estimate in linearfunctional relationships for alternative parameter sequences. Journal of the American Statistical Association 75 (1980): 230–237.10.1080/01621459.1980.10477458Google Scholar
23. Nagar, A. L. The bias and moment matrix of the general k-class estimators in simultaneous equations. Econometrica 27 (1959): 575–595.Google Scholar
24. Nagar, A. L. Double fc-class estimators of parameters in simultaneous equations and their small sample properties. International Economic Review 3 (1962): 168–188.Google Scholar
25. Pfanzagl, J. and Wefelmeyer., W. A third-order optimum property of the maximum likelihood estimator. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 8 (1978): 1–29.Google Scholar
26. Phillips, P.C.B. The exact distribution of instrumental variable estimators in an equation containing n 4 + 1 endogenous variables. Econometrica 48 (1980): 861–878.Google Scholar
27. Phillips, P.C.B. The exact distribution of LIML: I. International Economic Review 25–1 (1984): 249–261.Google Scholar
28. Sawa, T. Almost unbiased estimator in simultaneous equations systems. International Economic Review 14 (1973): 97–106.Google Scholar
29. Sawa, T. The mean square error of a combined estimator and numerical comparison with the TSLS estimator. Journal of Econometrics 2 (1973): 115–132.Google Scholar
30. Srivastava, V. K., Agnihotri, B. S., and Dwivedi., T. D. Dominance of double fc-class estimator in simultaneous equations. Annals of Institute of Statistical Mathematics 32 (1980): 387–392.10.1007/BF02480343Google Scholar
31. Takeuchi, K. Asymptotic higher order efficiency of ML estimators of parameters in linear simultaneous equations. Paper presented at the Kyoto Econometrics Seminar Meeting, Kyoto University, 1978.Google Scholar
32. Takeuchi, K., and Morirnune., K. Third-order efficiency of the extended maximum likelihood estimator in a simultaneous equation system. Econometrica 53 (1985): 177–200.Google Scholar
33. Theil, H. Economic Forecast and Policy, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1961.Google Scholar
34. Tsurumi, H. Comparisons of maximum expected loss (MELO) estimators with other limited information estimators: Some sampling experiments. Working Paper No. 10–80–1, Rutgers University, 1980.Google Scholar
35. Zellner, A. Estimation of functions of population means and regression coefficients including structural coefficients: A minimum expected loss (MELO) approach. Journal of Econometrics 8 (1978): 127–158.Google Scholar
36. Zellner, A. and Park, S.B.. Minimum expected loss (MELO) estimators for functions parameters and structural coefficients of econometric models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74 (1979): 185–193.Google Scholar