Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T17:29:38.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

COINTEGRATION RANK TESTING UNDER CONDITIONAL HETEROSKEDASTICITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2010

Abstract

We analyze the properties of the conventional Gaussian-based cointegrating rank tests of Johansen (1996, Likelihood-Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models) in the case where the vector of series under test is driven by globally stationary, conditionally heteroskedastic (martingale difference) innovations. We first demonstrate that the limiting null distributions of the rank statistics coincide with those derived by previous authors who assume either independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) or (strict and covariance) stationary martingale difference innovations. We then propose wild bootstrap implementations of the cointegrating rank tests and demonstrate that the associated bootstrap rank statistics replicate the first-order asymptotic null distributions of the rank statistics. We show that the same is also true of the corresponding rank tests based on the i.i.d. bootstrap of Swensen (2006, Econometrica 74, 1699–1714). The wild bootstrap, however, has the important property that, unlike the i.i.d. bootstrap, it preserves in the resampled data the pattern of heteroskedasticity present in the original shocks. Consistent with this, numerical evidence suggests that, relative to tests based on the asymptotic critical values or the i.i.d. bootstrap, the wild bootstrap rank tests perform very well in small samples under a variety of conditionally heteroskedastic innovation processes. An empirical application to the term structure of interest rates is given.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Parts of this paper were written while Cavaliere and Taylor both visited CREATES, whose hospitality is gratefully acknowledged. We are grateful to three anonymous referees and to Peter Phillips, Søren Johansen, Anders Swensen, and Carsten Trenkler for their helpful and constructive comments on earlier versions of this paper. We also thank Steve Leybourne for providing us with the data used in Section 6. Cavaliere and Rahbek thank the Danish Social Sciences Research Council, project 2114-04-001, for continuing financial support. Cavaliere also acknowledges financial support from MIUR PRIN 2007 grants. Rahbek is also affiliated with CREATES, funded by the Danish National Research Foundation.

References

REFERENCES

Brown, B.M. (1971) Martingale central limit theorems. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 42, 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burridge, P. & Taylor, A.M.R. (2001) On regression-based tests for seasonal unit roots in the presence of periodic heteroscedasticity. Journal of Econometrics 104, 91–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J.Y. & Shiller, R.J. (1987) Cointegration and tests of present value models. Journal of Political Economy 95, 1062–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavaliere, G., Rahbek, A., & Taylor, A.M.R. (2009) Co-integration Rank Testing under Conditional Heteroskedasticity. Granger Center Discussion Paper 09/02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavaliere, G., Rahbek, A., & Taylor, A.M.R. (2010) Testing for cointegration in vector autoregressions with non-stationary volatility. Journal of Econometrics, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavaliere, G. & Taylor, A.M.R. (2008) Bootstrap unit root tests for time series with nonstationary volatility. Econometric Theory 24, 43–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, X. & Phillips, P.C.B. (2008) Cointegrating Rank Selection in Models with Time-Varying Variance. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper 1688.Google Scholar
Cheng, X. & Phillips, P.C.B. (2009) Semiparametric cointegrating rank selection. Econometrics Journal 12, S83–S104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J. (1994) Stochastic Limit Theory. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diebold, F.X., Ji, L., & Li, C. (2006) A three-factor yield curve model: Non-affine structure, systematic risk sources, and generalized duration. In Klein, L.R. (ed.), Long-Run Growth and Short-Run Stabilization: Essays in Memory of Albert Ando, pp. 240–274. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Elliott, G. (1998) The robustness of cointegration methods when regressors almost have unit roots. Econometrica 66, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, R.F. (1990) Discussion: Stock market volatility and the crash of ’87. Review of Financial Studies 3, 103–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giese, J. (2006) Level, Slope, Curvature: Characterising the Yield Curve’s Derivatives in a Cointegrated VAR Model. Working paper, Nuffield College.Google Scholar
Giné, E. & Zinn, J. (1990) Bootstrapping general empirical measures. Annals of Probability 18, 851–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glosten, L.R., Jaganathan, R., & Runkle, D.E. (1993) On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of nominal excess returns on stocks. Journal of Finance 48, 1779–1801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, S. & Kilian, L. (2004) Bootstrapping autoregressions with conditional heteroskedasticity of unknown form. Journal of Econometrics 123, 89–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, S. & Kilian, L. (2007) Asymptotic and bootstrap inference for AR(∞) processes with conditional heteroskedasticity. Econometric Reviews 26, 609–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, A.D., Anderson, H., & Granger, C.W.J. (1992) A cointegration analysis of treasury bill yields. Review of Economics and Statistics 74, 116–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannan, E.J. & Heyde, C.C. (1972) On limit theorems for quadratic functions of discrete time series. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 43, 2058–2066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, B.E. (1992) Convergence to stochastic integrals for dependent heterogeneous processes. Econometric Theory 8, 489–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, B.E. (1996) Inference when a nuisance parameter is not identified under the null hypothesis. Econometrica 64, 413–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, B.E. (2000) Testing for structural change in conditional models. Journal of Econometrics 97, 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R.I.D. & Judge, G. (1998) Small sample testing for cointegration using the bootstrap approach. Economics Letters 58, 31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoue, A. & Kilian, L. (2002) Bootstrapping autoregressive processes with possible unit roots. Econometrica 70, 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, S.T. & Rahbek, A. (2007) On the law of large numbers for (geometrically) ergodic Markov chains. Econometric Theory 23, 761–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, S. (1996), Likelihood-Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johansen, S. (2002) A small sample correction of the test for cointegrating rank in the vector autoregressive model. Econometrica 70, 1929–1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensen, D. & Rahbek, A. (2005) Asymptotics of the QMLE for a class of ARCH(q) models. Econometric Theory 21, 946–961.10.1017/S0266466605050474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensen, D. & Rahbek, A. (2009) Aymptotics of the QMLE for non-linear ARCH models. Journal of Time Series Econometrics. Berkeley Electronic Press; http://www.bepress.com/itse/vol1/iss1/art2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, T.-H. & Tse, Y. (1996) Cointegration tests with conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics 73, 401–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, R.Y. (1988) Bootstrap procedure under some non-i.i.d. models. Annals of Statistics 16, 1696–1708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, J.G., Haug, A.A., & Michelis, L. (1999) Numerical distribution functions of likelihood ratio tests for cointegration. Journal of Applied Econometrics 14, 563–577.3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mammen, E. (1993) Bootstrap and wild bootstrap for high dimensional linear models. Annals of Statistics 21, 255–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantalos, P. & Shukur, G. (2001) Bootstrapped Johansen tests for cointegration relationships: A graphical analysis. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 68, 351–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D.B. (1991), Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica 59, 347–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, B. & Rahbek, A. (2000) Similarity issues in cointegration analysis. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 62, 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paparoditis, E.P. & Politis, D.N. (2003) Residual-based block bootstrap for unit root testing. Econometrica 71, 813–855.10.1111/1468-0262.00427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, J.Y. (2003) Bootstrap unit root tests. Econometrica 71, 1845–1895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesavento, E. (2004) An analytical evaluation of the power of tests for the absence of cointegration. Journal of Econometrics 122, 349–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahbek, A., Hansen, E., & Dennis, J.G. (2002) ARCH innovations and their impact on cointegration rank testing. Downloadable from http://www.math.ku.dk/~rahbek/.Google Scholar
Swensen, A.R. (2006) Bootstrap algorithms for testing and determining the cointegration rank in VAR models. Econometrica 74, 1699–1714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trenkler, C. (2009) Bootstrapping systems cointegration tests with a prior adjustment for deterministic terms. Econometric Theory 25, 243–269.10.1017/S0266466608090087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Weide, R. (2002) GO-GARCH: A multivariate generalized orthogonal GARCH model. Journal of Applied Econometrics 17, 549–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Giersbergen, N.P.A. (1996), Bootstrapping the trace statistics in VAR models: Monte Carlo results and applications. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 58, 391–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, C.F.J. (1986) Jackknife, bootstrap, and other resampling methods. Annals of Statistics 14, 1261–1295.Google Scholar
Xu, K.-L. (2008), Bootstrapping autoregression under non-stationary volatility. Econometrics Journal 11, 1–26.10.1111/j.1368-423X.2008.00235.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar