Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:46:09.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Religious Offences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Anthony W Jeremy
Anthony W Jeremy
Affiliation:
Solicitor, Research Fellow, Centre for Law and Religion, University of Cardiff
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the aftermath of the tragedies in the United States on 11 September 2001, the news media in the United Kingdom reported a great increase in crime and attacks on Muslims. A Director of the Central Mosque spoke publicly of the unprecedented backlash against the British Muslim community and whilst emphasising Islam to be a religion of peace and opposed to terrorism, urgently stressed the need for greater protection. The police chiefs were responsive. The government had to act.

Type
Articles
Information
Ecclesiastical Law Journal , Volume 7 , Issue 33 , July 2003 , pp. 127 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical Law Society 2003

References

1 Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001, Pt 5.Google Scholar

2 Seide v Gillette Industries Ltd [1980] IRLR 427, EAT.Google Scholar

3 Mandla v Dowell Lee [1983] 2 AC 548, [1983] 1 All ER 1062, [1983] 2 WLR 620. HL.Google Scholar

4 See Plato, , Apologia of Socrates.Google Scholar

5 Exodus 20: 7.Google Scholar

6 Whitehouse v Lemon, Whitehouse v Gay News Ltd [1979] AC 617 at 658, sub nom R v Lemon, R v Gay News Ltd [1979] 1 All ER 898 at 921, HL. per Lord Scarman.Google Scholar

7 R v Taylor (1676) 1 Vent 293.Google Scholar

8 R v Ramsay and Foote (1883) 15 Cox CC 231.Google Scholar

9 See generally Cambridge Cultural History of Britain, Vol 9 (Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

10 R v Lemon, R v Gay News Ltd [1979] QB 10, [1978] 3 All ER 175, CA (Crim Div).Google Scholar

11 Stephen, , Digest of the Criminal Law (9th edn, 1950);Google ScholarR v Lemon, R v Gay News Ltd [1979] AC 617, [1979] 1 All ER 898, HL.Google Scholar

12 R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, Ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429, [1991] 1 All ER 306, [1990] 3 WLR 986. DC.Google Scholar

13 Spencer, J R in the Cambridge Law Journal, November 1979.Google Scholar

14 Crime and Disorder Act 1998, ss 28–32.Google Scholar

15 Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Disorder Act 2001, s 39.Google Scholar

16 Addison, N, Racially Aggravated Offences http:/www.harassment/law.co.ukGoogle Scholar

17 Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001, s 39(7).Google Scholar

18 Public Order Act 1986, s 18.Google Scholar

19 In Bowman v Secular Society Ltd [1917] AC 406 at 459, HL, Lord Summer said ‘Blasphemy serves to protect the fabric of society’.Google Scholar

20 Gay News Ltd and Lemon v United Kingdom (1982) 5 EHRR 123.Google Scholar

21 X v Germany 9234/81: T v Belgium 9777/82Google Scholar

22 Whitehouse v Lemon, Whitehouse v Gay News Ltd [1979] AC 617 at 665, sub nom R v Lemon, R v Gay News Ltd [1979] 1 All ER 898 at 927, HL.Google Scholar

23 Otto-Preminger Institute v Austria (1995) 19 EHRR 34, ECom HR.Google Scholar

24 Wingrove v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR 1.Google Scholar

25 http//www.bnp.netGoogle Scholar

26 The Times. 25 Febuary 2003.Google Scholar

27 Lee Bowyer and Jonathan Woodgate case cited in Statewatch March/April 2001Google Scholar

28 R v Joseph Brian Saunders [2000] 1 Cr App R 458, CA.Google Scholar

29 Crown Prosecution Service v Weeks (14 June 2000).Google Scholar See also Brennan, Fernne ‘Racially Motivated Crime the Response of the Criminal Justice System’ 1999 CLR 17.Google Scholar

30 R v Gunn [1999] Lawtel 28 October 1999.Google Scholar

31 R v Scott The Times 16 July 2002.Google Scholar

32 For a general discussion, see Hill, Mark, ‘A sledgehammer for the nut-cases’ in Church Times, 19 October 2001, p 8.Google Scholar

33 See Doe, Norman and Jeremy, Anthony ‘Religious Justifications for Religious Autonomy’ in Current Legal Issues Law and Religion, edited by O'Dair, and Lewis, (Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

34 The New Delhi Report: The Third Assembly of the World Council of Churches 1961, p 159.Google Scholar

35 Stephens, , ‘The Law on Blasphemy and Blasphemous Libel’ Fortnightly Review, March 1884, p 289.Google Scholar

36 Seide v Gillette Industries Ltd [1980] IRLR 427, EAT.Google Scholar

37 Mandla v Dowell Lee [1983] 2 AC 548, [1983] 1 All ER 1062, [1983] 2 WLR 620. HL.Google Scholar

38 Commission for Racial Equality v Preston Manufacturing Services Ltd (Coit 4106/91)Google Scholar

39 See the discussion in Rivers, Julian ‘Religious Liberty as a Collective Right in Law and Religion’ in Current Legal Issues Law and Religion, edited by O'Dair, and Lewis, (Oxford University Press), p 237.Google Scholar

40 Dr Peter Jepheson. Tackling Militant Racism, Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar

41 See European Union Directive Establishing General Framework of Equal Treatment in Employment (27 November 2000).Google Scholar

42 Whitehouse v Lemon. Whitehouse v Gay News Ltd [1979] AC 617 at 658. sub nom R v Lemon, R v Gay News Ltd [1979] 1 All ER 898 at 921, HL, per Lord Scarman.Google Scholar

43 Williams, Rowan, Writing in the Dust (Hodder and Stoughton, 2002).Google Scholar

44 See the Report (HL Paper 95 I) and the oral evidence (HL Paper 95 II) and the written evidence (HL Paper 95 III).Google Scholar