Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:29:28.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Re St Peter in the Forest, Walthamstow

Chelmsford Consistory Court: Pulman Ch, February 2008 Churchyard – tunnel – fee

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2009

Ruth Arlow
Affiliation:
Barrister, Deputy Chancellor of the Dioceses of Chichester and Norwich
Will Adam
Affiliation:
Rector of Girton, Ely Diocesan Ecumenical Officer
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Case Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical Law Society 2009

Thames Water Utilities Ltd sought permission for the construction of a tunnel beneath one corner of the closed churchyard as part of a pipeline between a desalination plant and a reservoir. At the churchyard, the tunnel would be sunk to a depth of eight metres below the graves. The PCC and the DAC supported the petition. The incumbent opposed it. The chancellor held that the tunnel was not a ‘building’ for the purposes of the Disused Burial Grounds Act 1884 such that construction of the tunnel was not prohibited by that Act. The chancellor observed that the commercial value of a right to tunnel under the churchyard could have been substantial and that the PCC's obligations to maintain the church fabric meant that it should look to all proper sources of income. He held that it was not an ‘improper ransom’ to sell a right that has capital value for which a commercial enterprise would be willing to pay a proper sum. The chancellor endorsed the figure of £25,000 broadly agreed by the parties as an appropriate sum payable to the parish by Thames Water. [RA]