Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T06:18:29.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Parliamentary Report

February–May 2016

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2016

Frank Cranmer*
Affiliation:
Fellow, St Chad's College, Durham Honorary Research Fellow, Centre for Law and Religion, Cardiff University

Extract

On 9 May, the EU Justice Sub-Committee of the House of Lords, chaired by Baroness Helena Kennedy QC, published a report on the Government's proposals to repeal the Human Rights Act and replace it with a new Bill of Rights – and suggested that there was a forceful case for a Government rethink:

The proposals the Secretary of State outlined did not appear to depart significantly from the Human Rights Act – we note in particular that all the rights contained within the ECHR are likely to be affirmed in any British Bill of Rights. His evidence left us unsure why a British Bill of Rights was really necessary. If a Bill of Rights is not intended to change significantly the protection of human rights in the UK, we recommend the Government give careful thought before proceeding with this policy … the repeal of the Human Rights Act and its replacement by a Bill of Rights would be a constitutional change of the greatest significance.

Type
Parliamentary Report
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical Law Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Summary of Conclusions and Recommendations 2 and 3.

2 Section 1(9), emphasis in original.

3 [2015] NIQB 96.